I’m growing more and more impressed with its capabilities the more I use it! Wrapping my head around its approach to masking, and its “scene referred pipeline” took some time, but now that I’m getting the hang of it, I think I can say I genuinely prefer it to Lightroom.

Combined with digiKam, which is excellent for photo collection management, I’m a very happy photographer :)

  • blackstrat@lemmy.fwgx.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    In terms of noise reduction which greatly affects image quality it is nowhere near the big commercial players.

    • sic_semper_tyrannis@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Have you tried the “Denoise (profiled)” feature? It applies auto de-noising per your camera model and metadata quite nicely. You can then fine tune it after enabling the feature.

    • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’ve found the profiled noise reduction in Darkroom to do what I need. I’ve not noticed any significant difference between it and the results I was getting from Lightroom.

      • blackstrat@lemmy.fwgx.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        That may be so, but Lightroom is not the class leader in noise reduction. There are other programs out there that do a much better job

        • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Cool, but I don’t need class leader… I need “works on my linux box without loss of functionality compared to my previous Windows workflow”