NightOwl@lemmy.fmhy.ml to World News@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoRussia ambassador warns U.S. resolution pushes for nuclear war over Ukrainewww.newsweek.comexternal-linkmessage-square22fedilinkarrow-up121arrow-down13
arrow-up118arrow-down1external-linkRussia ambassador warns U.S. resolution pushes for nuclear war over Ukrainewww.newsweek.comNightOwl@lemmy.fmhy.ml to World News@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square22fedilink
minus-squareTomHardy@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year ago …, dispersing radioactive contaminates into NATO territory… This you left out on purpose?
minus-squareLols [they/them]@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-21 year agoyes, what with it not being one of the conditions for an “immediate response”, and actually just being elaboration on the actual conditions thats why it says “or their proxies, or the destruction of a nuclear facility, dispersing radioactive contaminates into NATO territory” as opposed to “or their proxies, or the destruction of a nuclear facility, or dispersing radioactive contaminates into NATO territory” so sure, on purpose, that purpose being treating the text as if it says what it actually says
minus-squareTomHardy@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agowhat? My point still stands NATO likes to sht but not to eat sht
This you left out on purpose?
yes, what with it not being one of the conditions for an “immediate response”, and actually just being elaboration on the actual conditions
thats why it says “or their proxies, or the destruction of a nuclear facility, dispersing radioactive contaminates into NATO territory”
as opposed to “or their proxies, or the destruction of a nuclear facility, or dispersing radioactive contaminates into NATO territory”
so sure, on purpose, that purpose being treating the text as if it says what it actually says
what? My point still stands NATO likes to sht but not to eat sht