@LMAO is flooding the site with random communities because they’re salty about being banned for claiming too many community names. They claim they’re trying to “fuck your entire site up” but I imagine it’s a relatively quick fix to delete all the communities they’re creating, LMAO.

  • boonhet@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Looking at his profile

    Since you banned my main for claiming community names, I’ll just fuck your entire site up instead. Much love, Angled

    Yeah can’t imagine why an instance admin might not want this insufferable piece of shit in their instance.

      • boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Doesn’t help too much, you can generate infinite email accounts with gmail for an example.

        Manual acceptance of each and every user helps, but it’s not sustainable.

          • S_204@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s what I used… I have no intention of being a troll or asshole, but I don’t want social media like this platform linked to me IRL and never have.

      • Necronomicommunist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Idk, seems like this is quite a pivotal time with an influx of users. Be a shame to have the potential growth in community go to waste.

        • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          True, but they could limit community creation to, say, five a day. That would be more than the vast majority of people would legitimately need.

          • XiELEd@lemmy.fmhy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Unfortunately that would mean that real communities wouldn’t be created since that would be used up by someone creating spam communities. Though, maybe limiting the amount of communities that could be made by one account in a certain amount of time? What about verification by email (to send a coherent reason) to the admins to create a community.

            • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              I was meaning five per day for a given user. That’s why I said that would be plenty for most individuals - most people aren’t legitimately going to want to create more than five communities in a day, and for them it wouldn’t be a hardship to wait a day for another five. But for people like this guy, trying to flood the instance with endless/pointless communities, it would cut that down to a manageable number.

        • PlasticExistence@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Counterpoint: we don’t need growth if the cost is the destruction of a good thing. Guided growth is smarter and more sustainable especially when users like the subject of this post aren’t unique. There are a lot of small, mean-spirited people out there who will take a dump all over everything the moment they can.

  • WideEyedStupid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The most annoying thing is that the “Trending Communities” section is filled with spam right now.

    I think this does show an inherent current flaw with Lemmy. We need a way to report users through their profile. So far we can only report users when they comment, but this guy isn’t commenting anywhere so there’s no report button. Unless I’m missing something. :p

    • StarManta@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s not an “inherent flaw”. It’s a flaw that currently exists in Lemmy, but one that could be easily remedied with a patch that adds a “report” link to the profile. An inherent flaw would be one that is difficult or impossible to mitigate due to the concept of Lemmy.

    • inverimus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There is already a proposal on github to hard limit and/or rate limit the creation of communities.

    • db2@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re not getting their jollies harassing people at reddit anymore. Remember, to them any attention is good attention. Employ child psychology because that’s where their mind is stuck.

      • Meldroc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yep. Same reason why they won’t just hang out at places like 4chan, Truth Social, etc.

        The libruls they want to “own” are here. They’re leaving Reddit because Reddit’s going to become a Nazi bar, seeing that half the mods left, and the other have had their tools nerfed. When the libs are gone, they get bored.

        • kescusay@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Mod of a city subreddit, here. That’s basically my fear. I love that community, but it’s become impossible to mod, and I have no doubt the absolutely worst people on the internet are going to be the majority of redditors eventually.

  • Iron Lynx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Alright, mate? You want all the random communities you can get? Let me suggest you to get your own instance to flood with them.

  • Netrunner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I can imagine that in the next few days we’ll discover everything the devs didn’t think about prior to this. Part of the fun.

    • Troy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      As General Patton famously said: no social media website survives contact with its trolls.

    • steltek@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Moderation on decentralized networks is way harder than otherwise, which was already a constant battle.

      I’m sure the devs thought of an attack but it gets deprioritized over fixing bugs and performance. I don’t think Lemmy was ready for Reddit’s collapse the way mastodon was with Twitter.

      • jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Mastodon was far from ready for the first Twitter wave either. And there’s also the question of whether the fediverse model can actually handle this much traffic, there’s a lot of inefficient back and forth messaging between instances that’s essentially baked into the protocol, something that’s the opposite of what you need to do in a distributed system.

  • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    So, it seems a few childish knobs came in with the refugees. Had to know it would happen.

    • SSUPII@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are many communities of my interest that didn’t exist. So in my case having only 3 would really cripple me

    • Randy_Bobandy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I actually like this idea. The prevention of supermods like AwkwardtheTurtle is absolutely something that should be considered.

      • Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        When people previously discussed this on Lemmy, the concern would be that bad actors would create multiple accounts to get around that rule.

        But again, the lock on a door doesn’t guarantee your house won’t get broken into, it only has to deter them with extra effort/risk that they will be less likely to do it.

        I honestly can’t imagine modding more than 2 communities at once. Do these people not have real lives?

          • Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Of course, like I said, it doesn’t need to keep out everyone, just preventing the lowest effort trolls would make life a lot easier for the mods/admins.

            Don’t let perfection stand in the way of progress.

        • Photographer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you want to mod 200 subs but you’re limited to 5-10 per account it is much much harder than being able to do it on a single account

      • a9249@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thirded. Canada is having political issues because the same 5 mods are infesting almost every sub. Limits are needed.

  • skillissuer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    first showing door to nazis, then spammers, then salty time wasters. looks like speedrunning history of internet in reverse

  • Norgur@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why even delete those communities? Just let’em have their three megabytes of database space that gets never used and be done with it.

    • Overzeetop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because they will show up in the communities list and be propagated (in the list) across federated instances.

  • renrenPDX@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    “I think you should go home now, Devin! Get back on San Vicente. Take it to the 10, switch over to 405 North and let it dump you onto Mulholland – where you belong!”