Elon Musk, the owner of X, criticized advertisers with expletives on Wednesday at The New York Times’s DealBook Summit.

  • YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    He’s trying to find a scapegoat to blame for destroying the company, and he seems to think he’s found it in the advertisers that are withdrawing their money.

    • root_beer@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Benny “Dry Humping Only” Shapiro is calling it an attempt to silence Musk and an attack on free speech

      These guys never showed up for fifth grade civics

    • drmeanfeel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Hard to deny this as he explicitly said it in this same interview, but the fan boys will

    • Sway@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      I heard David Samson (former president of the Miami Marlins) suggest that he wants the advertisers to all bail so that he can entice his sycophants to boycott the companies who pulled their ad revenue.

      He suggested that if you have the type of f-you money to waste that Musk does, then it’s simply an ego move. He’s not going to succeed with XTwitter so he might as well let it burn, and scorch as many people as he can in the hopes of getting petty revenge on those who crossed him.

  • Christer Enfors@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    10 months ago

    I thought this guy was supposed to be right wing? Doesn’t he like the free market? Because, I mean, the alternative is regulation. We could make antisemitism illegal, but in the west we have largely decided that we will instead rely on free market forces (read: public shaming) to root that shit out.

    It’s almost as if… and this might sound crazy, but hear me out… it’s almost as if this guy wants the advantages of capitalism, but none of its disadvantages?

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Everyone loves capitalisim until it’s inflicted on them. Oddly enough, this includes Musk.

      • Djad2410@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        28
        ·
        10 months ago

        What advertisers are doing isn’t capitalism it’s collusion to manipulate the market.

          • Djad2410@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            24
            ·
            10 months ago

            Obviously you don’t understand capitalism and your just going off what people who want communism and socialism are saying.

              • Djad2410@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                10 months ago

                Government regulations. Capitalism is a component of the government so it should take government action to enforce it.

                • frezik@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Really? Because I’ve been repeatedly told by libertarian types (not socialists or communists) that any government regulation is not capitalism.

                  You’re free to disagree with them, but then I’m going to ask what your definition of capitalism is that assumes this regulation (not just allowing it, but mandating it).

          • Djad2410@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            14
            ·
            10 months ago

            I simply made a claim to why something is happening whether or not is true is yet to be proven but that doesn’t mean it’s not a possibility. These companies want a hand in how the company is run and if they’re not getting what they want them calling each other up to coordinate an ads pull is a tool in their toolbox.

            • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              10 months ago

              Either bring facts, or state it as an opinion, don’t try to do both or you will get called out.

              • Djad2410@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                10 months ago

                It’s to early to state facts so it’s a given that most things mentioned this early would be opinions.

    • Diplomjodler@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      He’s a libertarian. That means he thinks he can do whatever the fuck he wants but will squeal like a stuck pig at the slightest sign of pushback.

  • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    10 months ago

    It’s very funny that his single biggest failure is so public. Like if The Boring Company couldn’t find customers, it would just quietly shut down. Newsworthy, but only for like a day.

    This is monthly stories about severe incompetence and petulance.

    • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Like if The Boring Company couldn’t find customers, it would just quietly shut down.

      If? Besides a few small projects have they ever scored anything significant?

  • NewPerspective@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    10 months ago

    It’s no extortion, it’s not blackmail, it’s abandonment. What took these companies so long? I’ll never understand how calling out the rescue diver for going to Thailand wasn’t the end of Elon.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    10 months ago

    The question is: Who the f–k does still pay for ads in that cesspit? There should be a wall of shame for those idiots.

  • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Elon: Go fuck yourself advertisers

    Advertisers: Understandable, have a nice day [doubles spend on other platforms]

    I don’t see how anyone expected this to end. I for one am hoping for a fatal ketamine od.

  • s_s@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    IMO this has less to do with Musk, or any moral consequences and more to do that most of Twitter’s traffic has always been bot activity, and companies are waking up to the fact that they have been paying to serve their ads to bots.

    I foresee facebook and reddit falling to the same fortune.

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I hope the businesses who come do like the BBC and spin up their own server. I don’t want them making accounts on places like Lemmy, like reddit, where someone is having their username taken away now for ‘trademark infringement.’ Username was “FoodNetwork.”

      The fact that reddit just letting business steal fucking usernames is god damned vile.

    • Ooops@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Companies give a shit about giving us information. It’s all about the advertising, so they will flock to the next closed-source company-controlled shithole.

    • KSP Atlas@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Problem is, advertisers likely do not want to go on mastodon because they can’t advertise there