Clemson University to ban TikTok on all campus networks effective Monday, July 10.

      • psykick@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fake news. American government would never spy on its own citizens!!

        /s

      • galloog1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        There is no known western API access directly into your phones through any major social media company and if it were known it would get patched. I’ll take the American spyware over the CCP spyware any day of the week, thank you very much.

  • booty_flexx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    [we are doing it for the] “integrity of information and resources connected to the Clemson network”.

    They’re not doing it to censor or discourage use. They’re doing it because they don’t want the software running on their network alongside their network resources.

    You can still use tiktok, just not while connected to their network infrastructure.

  • pandacoder@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The ban is on campus networks, but the reactions I’m reading are acting like this is a ban on the campus itself.

    It’s not censorship (or fascism), just like if they blocked PornHub it wouldn’t be censorship (or fascism).

    And no, blocking PornHub on a university campus where the vast, vast majority of connected users are 18+ isn’t justifiable unless it was under the grounds of security.

  • Alkider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lol how are they expecting to crack down on this if you can just use cell data.

    • S_204@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think this is more to discourage the use. Using cell data for video can add up quickly.

    • Unseeliefae@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      That is the point.

      People can use their own cell data to watch meme videos instead of hogging all the network bandwidth and slowing down wifi speeds for all the students who are trying to get actual schoolwork done.

    • S_204@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re only going to enforce it on their networks, if you want to run it on your cell that’s up to you. I think the point is to discourage it overall. If every institution makes the hurdle to use it higher, that will stem the use of it on campus.

        • zaph@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          M8 one more time: it is not about stopping students from using tiktok, it is about preventing tiktok from being accessed on the school network. No one cares if you turn off wifi and go on tiktok, that is literally what they want you to do if you wish to access it.

        • S_204@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think you are seriously underestimating the laziness of your average college student, but that’s just my opinion.

    • ChrisLicht@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not following. Can you elaborate a bit on how a private university banning TikTok is fascism?

      • lps2@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Clemson isn’t private, it’s public. It is certainly their prerogative to secure their network and their users’ data but there are definitely concerns over government censorship. I don’t think this issue is as black and white as people ITT are making it out to be and absent a larger policy stance that would van TikTok or it’s practices, I’m not sure this is the right move though I understand their position given the inaction of state and national legislatures in banning foreign spyware

        • zaph@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          They’re not banning their students from using tiktok, they’re blocking access to a website on their own networks. That is how network security works. I have many IP addresses block for many customers because some website shouldn’t be accessed on networks with PII. It’s really not that complicated.

          • lps2@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m well aware - as a public university things are a bit different as they are agents of the state so this becomes a free speech issue. Also, if a university’s student internet is the same network containing PII systems like their student records, there are much bigger problems. That’s why I mentioned that this action without any legislation that would curtail Bytedance’s data collection presents a student rights conundrum. The app does not (as far as we are aware) inject or capture information from the users network but rather the user themselves which they have consented to. The larger issue is whether or not the US should allow foreign entities to collect this info and that’s not something the university should be able to decide but rather the state and federal regulatory agencies and legislatures

      • irkli@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        29
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Because the only reason to bsn TikTok are racist reasons. Their practices have been examined closely and found to be less invasive than they rest. And Facebook, they’re horrible.

        The reasons usually given are mumbled generalities but refer to China getting access to American citizen data.

        “China” seems to be the common theme.

        The very data for sale on the open market. It’s all bullshit.

        I’m not defending TikTok and certainly not Chinese govt practices. They do evil. But no evidence of it in this instance.

          • Alkider@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I never said that shortform content is bad or that tik tok should be banned. I just couldn’t care less about the app because it just doesn’t have anything in particular that interests me. If it did I would be using tik tok and not lemmy lol. The comment above just kinda rubbed me the wrong way i guess.

    • Dark Arc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      facism: a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition

      I think you’d be better off just saying censorship.

      Ultimately though we’ve never seen anything like this, the old school rules for what constitutes acceptable censorship might need some adjusting (especially as society learns more about what closed source algorithms made by hostile foreign powers used by the youth – and general population – of a nation can actually do to said nation).