The U.S. and U.K. led a series of airstrikes in Yemen on Thursday evening, setting off alarms globally about how the attacks play into the smoldering regional risk of conflict — including a stream of questions from Congress about whether Biden was legally authorized to conduct the strikes at all.

  • Pohl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Repeal the AUMF you fucking cowards! Otherwise, shut your little mouths and be the meek useless branch that you seem determined to be.

    Put up or shut up congress.

    • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yeah, there’s absolutely a valid question of whether the AUMF is a good idea or not, but the fact of the matter is that it did pass, it is in force, and therefore essentially any military action - especially in response to direct attacks on American military ships - is unquestionably legal.

      If Congress would like to complain about the President conducting war without its authority, they should perhaps revoke the essentially unlimited authority to conduct war that it gave him.

      • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        What’s the argument that it’s a good idea? That congress is dysfunctional and can’t respond to urgent threats in a timely manner?

        • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          Basically, and that in the modern era where attacks can happen very quickly and with zero warning from non-state actors (as opposed to having to march an army across fields for days), the President needs to be able to react very quickly.

          Given the current state of Congress, with a shutdown looming, no real plan, and apparently now some rumblings of a plan to oust the Speaker yet again, I can kinda understand the logic.

          More cynically, it isolates Congress members from any political accountability.

          • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            10 months ago

            I understand the logic in this case but I still think congress should have more oversight of US military force. If the entire body is too cumbersome to react quickly, surely a delegated committee could be formed that can approve or deny actions quickly. The danger of having that power unilaterally available to the president is too great.

          • agitatedpotato@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 months ago

            So they really said “Instead of making our congress functional again, we’ll drop some of the oversights on warfare”. Brilliant.

      • FireTower@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        “All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.” Marbury vs. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803)

        • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          Rep Tlaib is welcome to file a lawsuit if she thinks the AUMF in unconstitutional. It would be a bit strange though if it survived 23 years of use, including actions in Iraq, Syria, Iran, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, and then a response to direct attacks on US Navy ships winds up being what sinks it.

          But again, these representatives can sue if they’re so confident.

        • yesman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          It’s ironic you bring up Marbury vs. Madison. The case where the Supreme Court gave itself the extra-constitutional authority to strike down laws.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The U.S. and U.K. led a series of airstrikes in Yemen on Thursday evening, setting off alarms globally about how the attacks play into the smoldering regional risk of conflict — including a stream of questions from Congress about whether Biden was legally authorized to conduct the strikes at all.

    In a statement, President Joe Biden said, “Today, at my direction, U.S. military forces—together with the United Kingdom and with support from Australia, Bahrain, Canada, and the Netherlands—successfully conducted strikes against a number of targets in Yemen used by Houthi rebels to endanger freedom of navigation in one of the world’s most vital waterways.”

    With Israel being brought before the International Court of Justice in the Hague for allegedly committing genocide against Palestinians in Gaza, the Houthi blockade of Israeli trade in the Red Sea could gain a newfound global legitimacy.

    “It’s appalling that instead of acting to stop Israeli war crimes, the Biden administration chose to further damage both our global reputation and our Constitutional system by launching a new unauthorized conflict against Yemen.”

    “Iran sowed hatred across the Middle East, and the world is now reaping endless attacks from Hezbollah, Hamas and Houthis,” said Rep. Brian Mast of Florida, who showed up to Congress in an IDF uniform on October 13, 2023.

    While Biden justified his Yemen strikes without congressional authorization, in 2020, when President Donald Trump was escalating hostilities with Iran, he was a staunch defender of the notion that Congress should be consulted before taking military action that could spark U.S. involvement in a regional war.


    The original article contains 1,245 words, the summary contains 260 words. Saved 79%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        10 months ago

        I love how this is the only reply these trolls have. The other turd is worse than the turd that’s currently committing atrocities. Checkmate!

        • GilgameshCatBeard@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          I love how this is the only reply these trolls have. The other turd is worse than the turd that’s currently committing atrocities. Checkmate!

          I love how this is the only reply those that bought into MAGA propaganda about “genocide Joe” have.

        • FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          The other turd that would absolutely commit the same atrocities if he could, because all American presidents have had the same stance on Israel in modern history, and Trump himself was showing no sign of being any different*

          “Oh, look at me, supporting proto-fascists because it’s ironic and whatnot”. Do you know what we call a person supporting a fascist? A fascist!

          I’m surprised, though. I thought your support of fascists was supposed to remain a secret, nazbol. You’re not supposed to say the quiet parts out loud.

          Pretty obvious that you don’t actually care about socialism or communism but are only here to promote “red” imperialism.

          You should probably know that left-wing politics are not an aesthetical concern designed to make people sound cool. It’s supposed to be about freeing the workers of the world from the yoke of capitalism.

          But the truth is that you only care about is your horse being the winning horse, out of (probably justified, tbh) hatred for the West. You’re willing to sacrifice the racial minorities, the LGBT, and the general working-class of both the West and the countries you’re shilling for because you never actually cared.

          Tough shit, though. It looks like it’s not happening today pal. Your horse will not win the race today. It’s not even close, in fact. We can talk about it in a year or 10 if you’d like. Seethe and cope (quoting you).

          You’re a disgrace.

          • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            10 months ago

            Nice straw man there, given that nowhere did I say I support the other turd in any way. I reject the entire horrific system. Meanwhile, you are the one who supports genocidal fascist because he makes scum like you more comfortable, and you don’t give a shit what he does to others.

            The blood of millions is on the hands of scumbags like you who prop up western imperialism.

            • GilgameshCatBeard@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              If you chose not to vote, you’re helping Trump win . Period. Thats how this works.

              Because if you weren’t going to vote Trump to begin with, but would have voted Biden had the “genocide Joe” movement not convinced you otherwise-

              Yeah… that’s a vote for Trump that doesn’t get canceled out.

                • GilgameshCatBeard@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  Wow… taking trolling to a whole new level where your temper tantrum has actually brought you to willfully helping end democracy because you don’t like not getting your way?

                  Incredible to behold.

                  I had wondered what the Bernie Bros would do without Bernie in an election year. Now I can see it.

    • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      The numerous times that he has proceeded to not do something after the SCOTUS tells him that it’s unconstitutional.