there’s too many comments and posts for me to view all of them, so the way that we can deal with them is you, the glorious people of 196 reporting them as you see them.

  • Lanthanae@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    I support the anti-aurhoritarian backbone of this, but it would probably be more helpful to focus on the content we want to avoid rather than assuming people will all have the same idea of what being a “tankie” entails. Not loving having dark violent imagery on my feed either but oh well.

    • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      From wikipedia

      Tankie is a pejorative label for communists, particularly Stalinists, who support the authoritarian tendencies of Marxism–Leninism or, more generally, authoritarian states associated with Marxism–Leninism in history. The term was originally used by dissident Marxist–Leninists to describe members of the Communist Party of Great Britain (CPGB) who followed the party line of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU). Specifically, it was used to distinguish party members who spoke out in defense of the Soviet use of tanks to crush the Hungarian Revolution of 1956 and the 1968 Prague Spring uprising, or who more broadly adhered to pro-Soviet positions.

    • eric5949@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      People who think the August Union was great actually and China is perfect no matter what. Not communists, stalinist and moaist communists.

    • MelissaLiberty@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      People that support the more authoritarian tendencies of historical Marxist-Leninist states (ie socialism). However, it’s mostly used as an insulting word for communist from uninformed liberals who then (like this idiotic post) compare them to literal nazis and the likes.

      • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Gross misuse of IE considering socialism is literally a less extreme version of communism.

        Marxist-Leninist was literally communism where in their own words it was “a dictatorship of the proletariat”. Where Marx and Engels literally dismissed socialism as “a middle class movment of quacks.” In Marx’s outline of socialism, it literally disregards it as “capitalism still exists to a lesser degree.” ML-communism is authoritarian and completely different that most forms of socialism as well as “pure” communism.

        Socialism, on the other hand has either state-controlled or private-but-worker-controlled economy with a democratically elected government and not necessarily single party. It was an entirely other school of people and ideas. China is not socialism as their government is not elected, but appointed by a ruling party. It is a statist-oligarchy plain and simple.

        Socialism is constantly misused. Stalin and hell, the Nazis called themselves socialist even though they weren’t at all. George Orwell actually said that Marxist-Leninist communism has circles around and is on the right again.

      • hal@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        He didn’t compare anything. He just listed what is not liked to be seen. you are delusional dude. just like any tankie usually is. (see, that was a comparison…)