• geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          The AIPAC donations in the primary went to Nikki Hailey. Trump started receiving his cheques after he defeated her.

          Is he in their pocket now? Of course. But he was not their preferred pick.

          • Midnitte@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            27 minutes ago

            Do you really need me to Google for you why the Golan Heights president is likely a worse outcome for the citizens of Gaza?

            Fine, how about his commitment to arm Israel with no strings attached? No humanitarian aid, no cease fires…

            Anyone who thinks the Muslim-ban president is a good outcome for Gaza only cares about the real estate value of Gaza.

        • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          Why wouldn’t they? You made yourself fascists by chasing him but that doesn’t change the fact that he was there before you. Of course they prefer him. Just like the American fascist voters you failed to swing.

          Being a loser doesn’t absolve you.

            • Sam Tamaskan@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              13 hours ago

              Of course, ignore all the rhetoric of trump and is ilk so you can call the other guy racist. That certainly seals the argument

              • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                13 hours ago

                Please take a step back, take a few breaths, and try to be coherent to the context you’re replying.

                If I were you I would either recant my position or be VERY offended that I was accused with merit of being a white supremacist. You singled out as a distinction that the bad things would happen here. To people like you. Fairly explicit that should mean something more than the lives that aren’t yours.

                This is definitional chauvinism.

                Wanna take another crack at replying now?

                • Sam Tamaskan@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  13 hours ago

                  What is there to be more coherent about? You boiled down that guy’s response to be about skin color

    • Linkerbaan@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      58 minutes ago

      Am I happy I was right when I told Blue MAGA they should stop running a campaign on Genocide and was banned from LemmyWorld?

      No.

      Was I right?

      Yes.

      Your takeaway should be to start ignoring the Blue MAGA cult who tell you to stick your head in the sand while Holocaust Harris is speaking. Criticize them and make them so unpopular that they run another candidate who is not Bidolf.

      • Telorand@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 minutes ago

        Alright. Well, gotta deal with the pain of having a criminal conman for a president on our individual ways, I suppose.

        I’m not really interested in criticizing people, myself. You can do what you like and convince people to join you in whatever way you deem fit, but in my experience, they tend to shut down and stop listening (maybe it’s my delivery). I’d much rather show them there’s hope elsewhere, especially because right now, that’s what a lot of people want. Honey vs. vinegar, and all that.

    • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      No, but I’m still disgusted by the amount of gaslighting we got for the last 8 months. All Harris had to do was make a plan to end the war, but she… didn’t. And some liberals want to call it our (people who didn’t vote for her) fault.

      • los_chill@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        More Palestinians will die under Trump. More Americans will suffer under Trump. More people around the world will suffer with a Trump presidency. But at least you showed the democrats…

        • tobogganablaze@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          53 minutes ago

          More Americans will suffer under Trump. More people around the world will suffer with a Trump presidency. But at least you showed the democrats…

          It’s almost like the tankies just want what’s bad for America and don’t actually care about palestine or human rights.

        • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          What will trump do to cause more Palestinian deaths?
          What COULD he do?

          Israel is already getting everything they wanted, and facing zero consequences or obstacles.

          I don’t disagree with you wrt American deaths, but that’s not what this post is about

          • Skydancer@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Granted, Biden did almost nothing to slow it down, and kept Israel well supplied with the weapons of genocide. Do you really think it’s a coincidence that Netanyahu waited until the day after the election to announce that Palestinians won’t be allowed to return to northern Gaza though?

            Granted, that was almost certainly the plan all along, but now even the fig leaf is gone. Without the need to devote any thought at all to political cover, Israel will stop even pretending to internal investigations of accusations against their own soldiers and redeploy those resources to the battlefield.

            The number of Palestinian deaths may not be different, but they’ll die even sooner.

            • Linkerbaan@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              57 minutes ago

              The Generals plan is in full full force. Netanyahu has already fully cleansed north Gaza.

              JOE BIDEN IS STILL THE PRESIDENT RIGHT NOW.

      • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        11 hours ago

        So, it was worth Trump getting a second term in order for you to maintain your moral purity?

        Listen, fuck Harris and every other Dem who failed to condemn the war in Gaza, they all deserve to burn in hell for that.

        But did you really get what you wanted out of this?

        • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Exactly. It was a douche and a turd sandwich. Refusing to vote because “they’re a turd sandwich” is simply saying “I’m okay with the douche”. It’s a 2 party system. There are no good candidates. Only one that’s marginally better than the other. Not voting is tacitly voting for the worst one.

          • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            anyone that did not vote kamala is now in part responsible for the inevitable increased suffering that will occur in palestine, lebanon, iran, and ukraine

            it really is that simple

            • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Increased suffering?
              How can their suffering be increased more than it is now?

              Israel is already getting everything could have ever wished for. There is nothing trump could do to make that worse.

              There were other reasons to vote for Harris, but this wasn’t one.

            • Achyu@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              Not a USAmerican, but by that logic:
              Are Kamala, her party and her supporters who couldn’t get those people to vote for Kamala also responsible for the increased suffering?

              Are they responsible for the people not being convinced that the suffering would be lesser under Kamala?

              Did Kamala and party show significant effort and good faith to woo those people?
              Or was it the 99% Hitler vs 100% Hitler thing? Asking since most online discourse I saw on it here in lemmy was like that, where they’re saying Trump would be worse, instead of saying that Kamala would be better, de-escalate stuff etc.

              • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 hour ago

                Yes, they are morally culpable too. Even more so than the people who refused to vote for them.

                That’s the thing about ethics when you actually apply it in reality; someone else being wrong doesn’t mean you’re right.

        • ᵀʰᵉʳᵃᵖʸᴳᵃʳʸ@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I’m surprised to see an antinatalist support Harris. Seems morally inconsistent, though perhaps not from a consequentialist perspective. I’ve been blocking everyone sharing your sentiment, but I don’t wanna block one of the few antinatalists here, so I’m commenting instead

          Is Harris’ loss my fault because I voted for De La Cruz? She could have easily earned my vote, but tried to court centrists and conservative voters instead.

          • Zanz@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Being an accelerationist makes even more your fault. It is bullshit the primary was skipped, but no progressives even tried to run there so you would have a similar choice.

      • Telorand@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        For my part, I’m not sure it is, though lack of votes didn’t help. The meme is perhaps meanspirited so soon after the painful news, but here’s my question, and this is genuine: now what?

        Trump will get to pick a bunch of lower federal judges and probably two more SCOTUS judges. What’s the way out when it seems to me that he and his jackals control the military, the police, and the judiciary? Seems like a hopeless setup to me.

        Harris lost, so what’s Step 2?

      • Sam Tamaskan@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        13 hours ago

        How did you think this election was gonna go? You think there was still gonna be enough votes for Harris? Or that by some miracle a 3rd party candidate was gonna be elected?

        People with your mindset are just as guilty as the dems are. No weasling out of this shitpile were now stuck in