• netvor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I used to love Sailfish OS.

      I guess I still do, but the problem is that while they recently expanded amount of devices they support, for some of them the “support” is just not what you think. Eg. I got Xperia 10 V just for the SFOS, but even though on their main list the device is listed as supported, turns out that camera, Android support and fingerprint sensor, these don’t work. To be fair, this info was possible to find on their forums, and I did not have to pay for SFOS (they offer 6 month trial), so they have nothing to gain from communicating so badly, but it is what it is.

      So in case you want to try it, just really make sure you know to what extent your device is supported.

    • transitinoir@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      Українська
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      Yes, they exist, but there is no reason to use them other than tinkering around. Also they have much worse security than Android or iOS. So if you need something private and open source there are a plenty of degoogled Android ROMs.

    • dinckel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      14 hours ago

      They definitely exist, and there is progress, but even in the best case scenario, you’re far from being able to comfortably daily one. postmarketOS is probably the most consistently updated project at this time

    • petsoi@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      I think it’s the other way round, when the amount of interesting SW is rising,the probability of good HW will be higher. And yes, as we can see, the SW can be developed independent of HW.

      • foremanguy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        You’re absolutely right

        Personnaly the hardware is not the problem it’s the price of it

    • 🍜 (she/her)@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Linux tablets? I have a lenovo tablet that now runs fedora, but the hardware is not meant for gaming. I think Legends of Lumia was the game that I played, but the sound was missing.

  • Integrate777@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I really wanted to try developing for these. But after flashing my old poco F1 with postmarket os, the phone died instead. Now I can’t justify buying a phone just for this.

  • Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    23 hours ago

    What makes these “mobile apps”? Are they special versions optimized for phones?

    • petsoi@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      They are enabled to (also) run on phones. E.g. libadwaita makes it possible to write application which can adapt to the screen size and therefore run on big and small screens.

      • Yozul@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        You don’t need libadwaita to do that. Lots of KDE apps are designed to work on mobile. Libadwaita just makes everything broken outside of Gnome.

          • Yozul@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            You sure did. Maybe libadwaita even includes tools to make it easier or something, I don’t know. I just think maybe the toolkit that breaks everything all the time isn’t the best example.

            • petsoi@discuss.tchncs.deOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              12 hours ago

              I know there is a lot of hate around.

              Nevertheless I find it a good example, because I think they have implemented the adaptivity between big and small screen sizes very well.

              • Yozul@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 hours ago

                Call it hate if you want, but it is an intentional design decision to break compatibility with other DEs. That is a choice they consciously made and have been very clear in communicating. There are trade offs involved. I’m not saying it’s a completely irrational choice or anything, but it is aggravating for those of us that don’t use Gnome when we have to deal with libadwaita apps. Libadwaita is designed from the ground up to be a Gnome exclusive thing. It is not for Linux. It is just for Gnome. That is the developers’ stated intention.

  • Matt@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Why does the site looks like it’s affiliated with Gnome?

    • Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      It seemingly follows the Adwaita theme popularized by Gnome and widely accepted in the Linux community.

      For me it’s a nice layout and I certainly get some enjoyment out of it being uniform with the interfaces I like on my computer.