Meta conducted an experiment where thousands of users were shown chronological feeds on Facebook and Instagram for three months. Users of the chronological feeds engaged less with the platforms and were more likely to use competitors like YouTube and TikTok. This suggests that users prefer algorithmically ranked feeds that show them more relevant content, even though some argue chronological feeds provide more transparency. While the experiment found that chronological feeds exposed users to more political and untrustworthy content, it did not significantly impact their political views or behaviors. The researchers note that a permanent switch to chronological feeds could produce different results, but this study provides only a glimpse into the issue.


I think this is bullshit. I exclusively scroll Lemmy in new mode. I scroll I see a post I already have seen. Then I leave. That doesn’t mean I hate it, I’m just done!

  • StarServal
    link
    fedilink
    3111 months ago

    This is a non-issue. Provide the chronological feed and let people choose how they want to consume their content.

    • Dr Cog
      link
      fedilink
      211 months ago

      That would be great, but it would lead to people not being as engaged in the site: the entire point of this corporate-sponsored research

    • @Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      111 months ago

      No but don’t you see the system is closed source and we choose how you consume it in a purely authoritarian manner and it could never be any other way.

      This is a real dichotomy.