- cross-posted to:
- hackernews@derp.foo
- cross-posted to:
- hackernews@derp.foo
Drugmakers Are Set to Pay 23andMe Millions to Access Consumer DNA::GSK will pay the DNA testing company $20 million for non-exclusive access to genetic data.
Drugmakers Are Set to Pay 23andMe Millions to Access Consumer DNA::GSK will pay the DNA testing company $20 million for non-exclusive access to genetic data.
The law here is inconsequential. The only protection that is certain is for the data not to exist.
It’s very much not.
Are you sure?
Yes. The issue you pointed to is being investigated after all. And there are potential damages if they are found to be violating the law.
Did it potentially being illegal actually stop it from happening?
It does stop other things from happening. So how do you square that circle? Or hopefully you can see that your simplistic thinking isn’t terribly useful?
Source please!
“Prove a negative, please!”
Fuck outta here
You’re asking them to explain why the rule of law discourages behaviours deemed to be against the law. You should be able to find evidence for that yourself, it’s an elementary tenet of any judicial system.
You want me to provide a list of laws that insurance companies are not currently violating?
How about the one that you say they will violate? They’ve been not violating that for years since it was passed.