• @AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    18 months ago

    The united states, every four years.

    The only reason that particular transfer of power is not called a revolution is because it isn’t violent. It’s kind of in the definition of the word. Peaceful transfers of power exist though.

    • @Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      58 months ago

      That isn’t a revolution that’s an election.

      They don’t, power comes from violence. Please effectively exert authority without using violence, id love an example.

              • @AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Forgive me for assuming you considered violence to be bad.

                Since we’ve presupposed that all authority must in some way stem from the threat of violence, a hatred for violence cannot exist without a hatred for authority.

                  • @AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    1
                    edit-2
                    8 months ago

                    This thread started because you asked someone to name a single nonviolent revolution. Such a thing cannot possibly exist, especially considering your inexplicably broad definition of that word.

                    You cannot seriously equate shooting someone with taking a child’s dessert away, simply because you consider them both to be violence. Considering this I’m a bit confused as to your point.