• Norah - She/They@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The mess is allowing decades of union-busting to be effective. Teachers in my state of Victoria (Australia) are heavily unionised, so US$50k is the starting salary. You would absolutely be making what she is now, $64k, if you’d worked for 8yrs like she had.

    Edit: And that’s just for public teaching jobs. Australia has way more private schools than the US and those pay even more. With 8yrs of experience it would be easy to get one of those positions and be making $70k.

    • stewie3128@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      25 years ago in my suburban Chicago public high school district, my stats teacher brought out the teacher pay schedule for us to play with.

      There were six columns:

      Bachelors, bachelors+30, bachelors+60 Masters, masters+30, masters+60

      The +30 or +60 refer to credit hours of additional college coursework

      Each row showed the number of years of experience.

      In 1998, the upper-left (fresh out of college, no experience) salary was around $38,500 or something.

      The bottom right (masters+60 or doctorate, and 30 or 35 years of experience [I forget]) was $151,000. And they got a great pension (fatter than what teachers in IL starting now will get).

      You also got a small multiplier for each extra curricular you ran.

      We had mostly excellent teachers as a result. Couple of duds too, but that’s life. 70+% of graduating seniors went to college of some kind within two years. I believe I went to a good school.

      But this is what happens when you fund schools through property taxes: the good neighborhoods get good schools, and it propels a virtuous cycle. The bad neighborhoods get bad schools, and they just spiral downward. It’s a dumb way to fund education.