I’m seeing discussions on other instances about how a “federated” corporate instance should be handled, i.e. Meta, or really any major company.

What would kbin.social’s stance be towards federating/defederating with a Meta instance?

Or what should that stance be?

  • lml@remy.city
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The problem is that if I want to communicate with Meta users, then my content gets copied onto Meta’s servers, just because of how the fediverse works. Everything is a local copy first, then gets federated. So if I reply to someone who is a Meta user, in order for them to see my comment it must get copied to Meta servers. The only way to stop this is to defederate with them (which means the server you are on would not send anything to Meta servers).

    • ch1cken@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The problem is that if I want to communicate with Meta users, then my content gets copied onto Meta’s servers

      whats the issue with this