• HelixDab@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fun fact: you can be opposed to capitalism without being a communist.

        You [tankies] maybe opposed to capitalism, but you’re still in favor of the coercive control of individuals by a state-level entity. That’s just another flavor of authoritarianism.

        • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          You can be a communist without being a tankie.

          I’m a Libertarian Communist. Small groups of people helping each other with a small government in terms of social control.

          A gobwnrmwnt sole job should be to help those that need of, not control peoples day to day lives.

          • HelixDab@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s closer to anarchism then communism. Communism, as it’s generally developed, has a central state authority.

            Personally, I see the existence of a state and individual liberties as always under tension. You can’t have a state without some infringement on individual expressions. But some restriction on individual expression is necessary for a functioning society. The question is what infringements and under what circumstances are acceptable.

      • Comrade Spood@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re just licking a different boot. All forms of hierarchy need to be abolished. State and capitalist. You don’t advocate for workers, all you advocate for is state control.