tl;dr- s23 ultra with snapdragon 8 gen 2 performed much better under heavy load than the 3nm a17 pro on iphone 15 pm

which shows -

  1. node size is useless as a17 pro was more inefficient
  2. android apps are also optimised, sometimes better than iOS
  3. bechmark scores are useless
  • nieceandtows@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Interesting results. Wonder how much would change after further software updates on the iphone. 15 pro seems to have had a poor optimization. If they had taken this video a week or so ago, it would have been considerably worse.

    • ijeff@lemdro.idM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This might be a limitation of their overall chip design. It’s meant to have a lot more power, but also to throttle more quickly. The A17 does this to a greater extent than the A16 (see RE: Village performance).

    • JWBananas@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      The 15 Pro issues are believed to be caused by compromised thermal design.

      Apple claims the heat issues with the 15 Pro stem from poorly optimized code and will be resolved through OS and third-party app updates. But if the thermal engineering truly is the culprit, then they are dealing with a fundamental hardware flaw.

      And if addressing the heat issue is their goal, there is only so much they can do in terms of software optimization. Unless they get very lucky and strike gold in terms of finding and correcting poor code, they will likely need to make performance worse to achieve the desired result.