• jadero@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    Seems straightforward to me. It’s pretty typical to permit testimony from those who were directly victimized. It’s also pretty typical to permit impact statements from those indirectly victimized.

    • TheMcG@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly what I was thinking. This just sounds like it would be a victim impact statement which serves very standard.

      I also fail to see how it could possibly be considered irrelevant.