If they can live there permanently, they’re not homeless, are they? And that sounds surprisingly anti-capitalistic, almost like what this meme is talking about.
Getting these people help makes sense from a capitalist perspective too, help them and they can work again and probably do a full life of that. It really isn’t anti-capitalist.
Why is it not a residence if you can stay there indefinitely? That sounds like a residence to me. The Internet tells me that ‘residence’ means ‘the place in which one lives; a dwelling.’ If they don’t ever have to leave, they live there.
You have to be fucking dumb. Get the fuck out. AcTuAlLy LoL ThE iNtErNeT blablabla. Do you really think a fucking chamber that you can only go to sleep is a fucking residence ? Are you a moron ?? Get an education dumb fuck.
This is not communist solution, this is half-socialism humant colony solution.
Real communist solutions look like this:
Trees are so fucking sexy. Really happy to live with a view onto trees.
Yeah!
At least until autmn when trees become so sad, that they cry with all their leaves and fill you with their sadness.
But spring and summer totally worth it. And even during winter there are beautiful sights sometimes.
Autumn’s beautiful though. It’s just that shorter days and the reason can make it a bit depressing.
Pretty sure thats Pripyat.
Shit still looks better than a tent under a bridge you know.
There is a thing called “homeless shelter” and Im pretty sure its more than just a tent
More and worse. Been there. Done that. Got stalked in the shower by a mentally ill guy and they did fuck all about it.
Do you think they let you live there permanently?
In pretty much every country other than the US they do, these images are always very strange because they’re so focused on the US.
If they can live there permanently, they’re not homeless, are they? And that sounds surprisingly anti-capitalistic, almost like what this meme is talking about.
Getting these people help makes sense from a capitalist perspective too, help them and they can work again and probably do a full life of that. It really isn’t anti-capitalist.
Yeah they do, actually. At least in most countries…
Then they’re not homeless. If you have a place where you can live as long as you like, you have a home.
A shelter is not a residence
Why is it not a residence if you can stay there indefinitely? That sounds like a residence to me. The Internet tells me that ‘residence’ means ‘the place in which one lives; a dwelling.’ If they don’t ever have to leave, they live there.
You have to be fucking dumb. Get the fuck out. AcTuAlLy LoL ThE iNtErNeT blablabla. Do you really think a fucking chamber that you can only go to sleep is a fucking residence ? Are you a moron ?? Get an education dumb fuck.
So homeless people dont exist then? Because where I live, everybody could go to a shelter for as long as they like.
If they don’t live in a shelter indefinitely, yes. They are homeless.
They could live in a shelter indefinitely…
Not sure what the difference is. They are both pictures of high density buildings.
Height and what surrounds them.
That’s a framing difference for the photo.
And age…
Ugh, living in a forest like that sounds idyllic
There is no such thing as half socialism. There is only the oligarchy deigning to not be complete assholes, as long as you agree to beg.
I’m pretty sure that’s an issue with maintenance, not communism. And I’d still rather live there than in a tent.
Is the point supposed to be that they haven’t been cleaned in a while?
Otherwise they don’t look that bad. 🤷
No one realizes what this is a picture of huh?
And it failed miserable, at that.