A cop’s decision to sport a body camera and search a Massachusetts middle school for a book has raised serious concerns among civil liberties experts, a new report shows.

The Berkshire Eagle reported Wednesday on mounting fears after the Great Barrington plainclothes police officer who entered an eighth grade classroom at W.E.B. Du Bois Regional Middle School.

“Police going into schools and searching for books is the sort of thing you hear about in communist China and Russia," Ruth A. Bourquin, senior and managing attorney for the ACLU of Massachusetts, told the local news outlet. "What are we doing?”

For their part, police say they were obligated to investigate a complaint about the book “Gender Queer” by Maia Kobabe, a memoir about gender identity that contains sexually explicit illustrations and language, the report notes.

  • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)@badatbeing.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The full news article states that they do not have that authority, this is just ass covering by wanna be heroes of oppression.

    This “report” was done anonymously probably for the reason they knew it was BS, and just looking at the report should have been enough to dismiss it. At the very most a phone call to see if the school wanted to handle it, but sending an officer should get all involved parties suspended without pay. That principal should have also called bullshit and never escorted a cop to a classroom to search for a book. They should also be suspended and the policy gone over again on what to do with these bullshit book banning “reports” (deleted/recycled).

    Edit - extra shit

    • TheChurn@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      The problem with the principal refusing to escort the officer is then they are obstructing a police investigation, and that is a crime. It isn’t fair to put this burden on them, the blame lies squarely with the police chain of command.

      In fact the root problem of all things police is that once police decide to do something, even if that thing is illegal, interfering is a crime.

      This is how we end up with people being charged with resisting arrest, and no other crimes that would warrant an arrest. This is also how we end up with a bunch of people live streaming George Floyd’s execution, because stopping a cop from killing someone is a crime.

      • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)@badatbeing.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Should have asked them to come back with a warrant as that is within his legal rights. The officer had no reason to suspect any real harm to any child in a school classroom after hours (this all happened after school was out for the day).

        • TheChurn@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          With a complaint and a full description of the offense, the officer had cause to force entry.

          Same as if someone called in a suspicious package, they wouldn’t need a warrant to gain entry.

          Society gives police an incredible amount of leeway.

          • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)@badatbeing.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            On the complaint of a book? I’ll call bullshit on that, and no way that would hold up in any sane court. A book is not something that should give police any probable cause, and really something that the police shouldn’t even be investigating. Having police coming in to schools to look for books is so far out of what they should be doing the principal should have laughed and called the station to ask what the hell is going on over there.

            • TheChurn@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I agree with you, but it doesn’t change the implications of a police officer having a complaint and a sufficient description to follow up on it without a warrant.

              It is at their discretion, same as if you called in that your grandma didn’t answer the phone, they could ignore it or bust down the door. Both would be fully legal.

              Court is a different matter. A judge could say there wasn’t cause to search after the fact, but that won’t change what the police do in the moment.