• Kajika@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yeah me neither, I posted a comment to tell that I am just sharing the news.

    I am not touching flatpaks or snaps or appimage or anything like those either. But I am wondering how the community here would think of it. In hacker news they talk a lot about ‘enterprise’ support and all. I guess they are more biases toward those kinds of things. I guess there’s a difference between how users/business interact with software and developers.

    • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Flatpaks are actually pretty OK. There’s a security layer that can tweaked with FlatSeal and you can control every single resource a flatpak binary has access to.

      • borari@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I feel like I remember there being a lot of pushback against flatpak even as recently as a few years ago. Wasn’t there a strong preference for programs to be in mainline repos or something like the Arch AUR?

        I know the AUR is being depreciated soon. Was there a major shift in receptiveness to flatpaks or something? From a security point of view I feel like the baked in sandboxing of flatpak binaries is probably a strong selling point.

        • Vorthas@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Wait, AUR is being deprecated? You got a source for that? That’s like the one major selling point of using Arch or Arch-based distros (EndeavourOS, etc.) for me. I personally prefer to install my programs natively and not use snaps, flatpaks, etc.