Paramount Global, amid a swirl of M&A discussions, is laying off about 800 employees worldwide as it looks to trim costs.

Paramount Global, amid a swirl of M&A discussions, is laying off about 800 employees worldwide — an estimated 3% of its headcount — as it looks to trim costs.

…

For the third quarter of 2023, Paramount Global’s revenue rose 3% thanks to its growth in its streaming and film businesses — but revenue in its largest division, linear TV, fell 8% as sales of traditional television advertising continued to contract (declining 14% in the quarter).

  • Copernican@lemmy.worldOP
    4·
    9 months ago

    But I think the argument here is a specific business lines are failing. Namely advertising revenue for Linear. Linear TV is cable. So as cable subs get cut, you can’t just shift linear staff over to digital, because digital staff were already hired and working in parallel to build that business.

    For the third quarter of 2023, Paramount Global’s revenue rose 3% thanks to its growth in its streaming and film businesses — but revenue in its largest division, linear TV, fell 8% as sales of traditional television advertising continued to contract (declining 14% in the quarter).

    It’s strange. On lemmy people hate ads. They hate cable TV. But you have to realize if people stop watching ads and people stop paying for cable, then people that work in that area will probably lose jobs.

    • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.comEnglish
      4·
      9 months ago

      I think my concern is that businesses operate in an “empathy-free” zone that we tolerate because we’re used to it. The strictures of market economics certainly are hard to argue with when employing 100 people is the difference between a business surviving or failing.

      The layoffs that are happening now are not going to cause Paramount to succeed where it failed, just like the ones at Google, Meta, Microsoft, Disney, Spotify, and so on. They are about maintaining a certain profitability metric.

      While that type of spreadsheet game may be normal, it really isn’t necessary. For Paramount, for example, good people could often be redeployed to other areas. Treating employees like people means understanding that there should be a higher bar for layoffs. Employees are committing a substantial part of their life to work - most of our waking hours of a finite life. The idea that a layoff happens because a CEO, Wall Street or other “stakeholder” can’t be bothered to try to redeploy their talents is just deeply depressing and dehumanizing, in subtle ways.

      I’m not naive, I understand capitalism. But it doesn’t need to be this way.

      • Copernican@lemmy.worldOP
        3·
        9 months ago

        I think there needs to be better unemployment security and resourcing. I think there are certain jobs that should be let go over time. IE, if we get off fossil fuels, I would expect a lot of people to lose those jobs in fossil fuel. As we get more automation, that is going to replace those jobs. I think right now it’s hard to determine what is reasonable or justified layoffs for business reasons, and what is really there to just pump the stock up. But everyone knows cable TV is going to die… I would expect jobs to be cut. Similarly Sky TV recently also had a layoff of a percentage of the work force. That primarily hit the technician team that was responsible for installing cable boxes in people’s homes.

        I am hoping one day we can have tax system that makes sense and is fair, and support a UBI eventually.

        What I find kind of amusing about some of the comments on this thread are the communist leaning folks seem to parrot neo libs where the solutions is jobs for the sake of jobs.