Incandescent light bulbs are officially banned in the U.S.::America’s ban on incandescent light bulbs, 16 years in the making, is finally a reality. Well, mostly.

    • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because they’re driven entirely by emotion, not rationality. They were told to be angry about it, so they are. Plus, Biden or something.

    • WEE_WOO@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Something about limiting consumer choice, but everyone purchased LED bulbs to begin with anyways…

    • beigegull@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because imagining that someone might have a legitimate reason to want a product or service that a regulator might not have thought of is currently a “Republican” trait in the US.

      • tired_n_bored@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Does anybody use incandescent light bulbs as radiators? Because it’s the only alternative use I can think of.

        In the European Union we banned them 10 years ago and people just continued their lives. I wish people were as mad when books get banned, but sadly it’s not the case

        • beigegull@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Does anybody use incandescent light bulbs as radiators?

          Yes. I’ve done it personally a couple times.

          Because it’s the only alternative use I can think of.

          The thing about alternative uses is that they’re still real even if you can’t think of them.

          Broad bans are a bad policy tool in general. Even if you believe in the progressive ideal of expert regulators making broad societal policies, a simple thought experiment shows the problem: What would it take to do the study to accurately determine all the negative effects of a ban? Not guessing, not wishful thinking, but really collecting and analyzing the information.

          I wish people were as mad when books get banned, but sadly it’s not the case

          When was the last time the US federal government banned a book?

            • beigegull@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Once you’re doing resistive heating any resistive element is just as efficient as any other. Incandescent light bulbs have three advantages: They are cheap, easy to work with, and it’s really obvious when one is turned on.

              As for your link, it’s talking about arguments about which books should be made available at school and local libraries. In no sense is that even related to the federal government banning books.

              • tired_n_bored@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Well I’ve never said the US federal government is banning books, but I wish people were as mad when their local schools and libraries do that :-)

            • tired_n_bored@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The link seems broken even if I copy-paste it? Wtf. It’s a Wikipedia article titled " 2021–2023 book banning in the United States"