• danielton@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not the person you’re replying to, but Linux has long had a policy of “F backwards compatibility” in the userspace. Try running a 10 year old binary on the current version of a distro. Try a 5 year old binary. Chances are, it’s not going to work, or you’re going to go through dependency hell trying to get the correct library versions for that old binary.

      But notice how Windows 11 can run a Windows XP app.

      That’s the problem. Most users aren’t going to want to compile from source, assuming the software they’re trying to use is even open source. Hell, nvidia users constantly have driver issues because the binary blobs must be updated to continue working after kernel updates. And that’s not to mention all the competing package managers and distro quirks with library versions and naming.

    • Aux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      You can run 16 bit Windows 3.0 apps on Windows 10 on compatible hardware. Can I run any Linux application compiled 20+ years ago on any modern distro without any fuckery? No. I can’t even run apps compiled for the latest Arch on the latest Ubuntu, lol. Software development for Linux is a total nightmare.

      • Fubber Nuckin'@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is true, but kind of exaggerated. I can’t run some windows 7 apps on Windows 10. I have been able to run some backalley Linux software from an html 1.0 site designed in the 90’s no problem.

        On both platforms backwards compatibility is a little hit or miss, but yeah Linux is worse.

        • Aux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, some apps might not run. Yet some Win16 do actually run on Windows 10.