• Trump and his supporters are slamming Joe Biden for quitting the race and endorsing Kamala Harris.
  • Some members of MAGA world are bemoaning the millions of dollars spent running against Joe Biden.
  • Biden’s withdrawal also means Trump is now the oldest candidate in the presidential race.
    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      They’re going to, probably in every single red state.

      They’re going to throw so much shit at the wall due to election ballot timing that unfortunately I think something will stick… it more than likely wont be legitimate, but we have way too many corrupt judges out there :(

      • ceenote@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        5 months ago

        I don’t think it’s a given that something will stick in a way that actually throws a wrench in the election. It would have to be in a swing state, the judge would have to be willing to become infamous around the world, and willing to ignore the precedent that generally political parties can choose candidates how they want and of course a nominee can decline the nomination.

        Oh fuck, Aileen Cannon exists…

      • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        5 months ago

        If there is any way Mississippi and Arkansas can keep a black woman Democrat off the ballot, they will find it.

          • Mirshe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 months ago

            Except other states could use that as a case to federally disqualify a candidate. “Well they weren’t on the ballot in all the states, can this be said to be a representative vote?”

            • dhork@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              5 months ago

              Ironically, this is where the SC’s ruling to keep Trump on the ballot can be helpful. Because as long as the proper paperwork is filed in time, the committee can nominate whoever it wants, and the state doesn’t have the power to disqualify someone.

        • Coffee Addict@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          It’s a good thing we had no chance of winning those states then lol.

          If they did, it might actually drive up voter enthusiasm around the country. So I could see it backfiring spectacularly.

        • Gigasser@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Ehh not like deep red states would ever swing towards the Dems anyways. So fuck em

    • andros_rex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      They aren’t going to sue. They are going to start shooting. They’ve outright stated that. It’s crystal clear: they’ve said that the revolution would be “bloodless” only if the left “allowed” it to be. I really wanted to live long enough to build a family,.

      • DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        You missed what Johnson said this morning. He says it’s “unlawful” in some states. (Which is not true in the slightest and they know it)

        How much you want to bet that this only will be “unlawful” in red governmental shithole states

        He’s basically giving a dog whistle to maggot judges to hold the line for the fascist party’s interest if these “challenges” come to them.

        Edit: fixed for feels being hurt / jimmies rustled

          • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            The only nice thing about those red shitholes is that it’s stupidly easy to get a gun. Get one. Join your local chapter of the SRA. Train at the local range at least twice a month so that you are proficient with it. Learn all the local stand your ground laws. Memorize them. When they start shooting, aim center mass.

            While a pistol is far more portable, it requires far more training, as the lower mass of the firearm results in a larger than expected kick. Shotguns are really the weapon of choice for urban defense.

            I personally have a couple of extremely nice sniper crossbows, that are basically silent. Seriously, the bolt impacting my target makes more noise than the bow. A couple of T-33s, an AA-12, and a 30-06. Lots of ammo too.

            Learning how to reload your ammo is also invaluable, should they start shooting. Have a “riot shield,” basically the largest piece of steel you can easily carry that is more than 2" thick. Body armor is also a useful investment.

            • ulkesh@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              5 months ago

              I find it turns my stomach at the thought of training at a gun range with people who would rather shoot me in the head than tell me the time of day. That’s the kind of gun fetishists who live in the area I’m at.

              • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                5 months ago

                Not that I’m advocating for training with intent cause there’s far too much gun violence as it is, but if you are in a gun range and training to use a gun, the wack jobs are all going to assume you are one of them. They really believe that liberals are scared of guns and wouldn’t dare to own one. Much less train to use one.

              • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                Carry isn’t the right word here. I have a 6’ x 2’ x 2" piece of steel that I mounted on a stand and wheels. It’s technically mobile in that I can move the thing with effort. It is bulletproof though. I have tested it against AP rounds.

                I don’t take it with me on protests, it sits in my house in one of the most defensable positions in the house.

                Yeah the thing weighs about half a ton.

            • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 months ago

              Speaking from experience, SRA in central FL/ Orlando is useless. Paid $35 to be put into the Jacksonville SRA and got a link to an inactive discord channel.

              I’m all ears for a viable alternative until I get out to Colorado.

            • TehWorld@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              A 1 square foot, 2 inch steel plate is 81lbs. Ain’t nobody carrying armor like that.

              • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                Carry isn’t the right word here. I have one that is 12 sq feet, it is “mobile” in that it has wheels and a stand. I can barely move the thing around, but it is certainly bulletproof. I e tested it against AP rounds. Yes the thing weighs about half a ton.

        • BetaBlake@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          5 months ago

          Can we try not to talk like Trump? No state as a whole is a shit hole full of shit hole people, those kinds of statements reek of elitism and it’s not a good look.

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      They’re just trying to rile up their base that this is “cheating” so that they come out to vote in outrage

      • edgarde@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        They’re ginning up arguments about “cheating” in case they lose. Trump has never admitted to losing an election, always claiming the winner cheated. And as we saw on Jan 6, it really riles up the dirtbags that form Trump’s unique voter constituency.