or just a ‘poof’?

  • Oooo, good question. What if it were traveling, relatively, at a fair percentage of C? Say 80 or 90%? What if it went not straight through the center, but say 30% off of center? Would any mass make a complete pass through, at that velocity? It’d be about 23% more dense from relativity, but countless YouTube videos about gun ammunition has taught me that velocity is the biggest factor in armor penetration. Would it blow a huge plume of plasma out the other side?

    Dude, you just made this no doubt question far, far more interesting!

    • cevn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      Fascinating. Lets say at 90% the planet spends 1 second inside the sun. Doesn’t seem like enough to melt the whole thing so it just keeps going, just a lot smaller. The core of the sun tried its best to push it back but gets pierced and the fusion reaction stops. Star killer??

      • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Edit: I was off by a big order of magnitude, see my reply to this comments reply.

        No. You are also forgetting the density of the sun increases with depth. For instance, if it’s heading for the core - the solar core is about 155g/cm^3. Where as earth is 5.5g/cm3.

        Essentially, going 0.9C is going to impact the sun, and we can say the incoming earth object is going to classically hit with 4.9*10^24 J.

        At this size and and energy, we compare it to the rest energy of the entire sun (this isn’t how we would actually do it) but the sun has a total resting mass energy equivalence of like 1.8x10^41 J.

        The energy of the earth like object impacting the sun is 0.000000000000000027%.

        The sun effectively doesn’t even know it happened.

        • cevn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          3 months ago

          I knew my crap science would get the real scientists in the comments, good point about the density. It would just sort of harmlessly splat.

          • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            Now hold on, I did my math wrong. It was far too late at night. I used C=300000 not 3*10^8.

            That gives us an impact energy, classically, of 5.37*10^41 J.

            So that is about 3 times the kinetic energy than the engery at rest of Sol.

            Sol is not at rest, further, we have non- insignificant factors at play here.

            Sol is orbiting Sagittarius A* at 250km/s. Additionally, we have the general relativistic relationship between Sol and our massive projectile.

            I’m going to work on modeling this, it got far more interesting.

      • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 months ago

        Another comparison here. If a human was just made of ballistics gel, weight for weight, meaning no vital organs or anything, a 10g round would hit a target it 1/9000 the side of.

        Earth, hitting the sun would be like something 1/800000 this size of.

        Oh shit my lunesta kicked in. Someone better double check my numbers

    • netvor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Dude, you just made this no doubt question far, far more interesting!

      …and what if it was running AWAY from the sun!

      Here, Fixed it for ya.

    • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Oooo, good question. What if it were traveling, relatively, at a fair percentage of C? Say 80 or 90%?

      How many objects (not counting the “Heart of Gold”) do you know that are traveling at such speeds?