Oh hey, also the same thing with environmental issues

    • OccamsRazer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      Yeah but the point is if you don’t know how to spend it responsibly, then what good is it? If you spend it on drugs or alcohol because that’s more important to you than shelter, which is the case for serious addicts, then it doesn’t help you. Instead it only enables your addiction and keeps you on the street.

      • Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        Yeah… Then they’d need someone helping them with their money I guess. If I had a magic wand I’d make all substances legal but manufacture and sales strictly controlled by the government… When someone gets to the point where the addiction is so bad they’d choose substance over housing or food, offer them free housing and all the drugs they want for free, but the housing is a special community just for that, with like therapists and nurses galore. When they’re ready to stop using move them to the recovery community… Still free housing but also start reintroducing them to alternative activities besides drugs… All of this would require a shit ton of money though… And right now that money is almost all going to the pharma companies for their alternative drugs that never actually get people off drugs

        • OccamsRazer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          In general the concept sounds ok, but I think the reality would make it a death camp since many of those drugs are so addictive that you simply won’t break free on your own, without being forced to quit.

          • Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            If they want to be forced that should be an option too… But so should the option of continuing to use until it kills you… but even then we should do our best to keep them as healthy and comfortable as possible because in the long run it costs society less that way and it’s easier to get out of when they decide to

            • OccamsRazer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              I don’t think you are doing drug addicts any favors by letting them continue to use. Their life is better without that addiction and a healthy society would help them as much as possible and feasible. I’m all for personal freedom, but I don’t view addiction as being free.

              • Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 days ago

                Addiction isn’t freedom… But the only way to beat it is for that person to choose to fight it themselves… Until they make that choice we’re just wasting time, energy, and money trying to force them to