The United Nations human rights chief says weaponizing ordinary communication devices represents a new development in warfare.
  • Pennomi@lemmy.worldEnglish
    351·
    10 hours ago

    It’s enforceable. A war between two countries does not exist in a vacuum. The whole rest of the world can impose sanctions against the violator.

    Whether they will in this case is another matter entirely.

    • MrNesser@lemmy.world
      103·
      10 hours ago

      Problem with sanctions is they haven’t proved Israel did this. Its plausible deniability

      • homura1650@lemmy.world
        151·
        10 hours ago

        Part of plausible deniability is that it has to be plausible. There has been no plausible argument presented that Israel did not do the pager and walkie talkie attack. For that matter, there hasn’t even been a denial about it.

        • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
          2·
          5 hours ago

          Then again a denial would also not be plausible. Either way, saying nothing is their best course of action.

    • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
      36·
      10 hours ago

      Is that law though? No one is going to jail. Sounds more a contract or agreement.

        • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
          1·
          5 hours ago

          The difference is enforcement capabilities. Geopolitical enforcement is not impossible it just gets murky quick. So many different priorities.