“Fidelity is currently valuing X at about $9.4 billion”

I found this funny.

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    20 hours ago

    We knew this was going to happen before he made the purchase.

    Everyone said, the best way for Elon to keep his money was to change very little, or even take a hands-off approach.

    Masnick suggested this would happen

    It was that and so much worse. Moral of the story: Running a huge social media service is hard. Maybe don’t assume that because you’re a billionaire you’re the best at doing stuff.

    • Gloomy@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Masnick gives 20 levels of development. Elon stopped here:

      Level Two: “We’re the free speech platform! But no CSAM!”

      And that’s about it. Ex-Twitter has copyright infringement, hate speech and doesn’t give a fuck about local laws unless the law actually has teeth (Brasil, anybody?).

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I mean the people at Twitter were very happy to sell it off. Remember how they actually sued to force him to go through with the deal and succeeded in stopping him from backing out?

      Even if he’d managed it as well as the prior stewards, it was always a losing business.

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 hours ago

        If the price offered is actually a good price then I think they might have some obligation to shareholders to pursue it. (Many of the people making that decision likely also being shareholders.) Like if someone offered you more than what your stuff is worth but tried to changed their mind, wouldn’t you pursue that? I don’t think that’s any sort of indicator that they thought it was a sinking ship. It’s just in their best interest to take a good deal when they get one.

    • mynameisigglepiggle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Meanwhile he is on track to become the world’s first trillionaire

      I think the purchase was more about welding power than any financial gain

      • jaemo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Now, call me crazy, but if I was optimizing for maximum welding power, I’d start with oxy acetylene and at least try a few other options. How would buying a website even be a good start?

        No wonder people are making fun of him!

      • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Hasn’t his wealth kinda flatlined lately though? X is doing terribly, Tesla is struggling a bit, I think SpaceX is at least doing well.

        I don’t think he’s going to be a trillionaire any time soon.

      • Another_earthling@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Would you not agree that he has a tool of influence with X? I see that as the main aspect of why you’d still buy twitter, even though he knew he wouldn’t earn money with that.

      • Da Bald Eagul@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        17 hours ago

        He tried to back out, I don’t think any of this was about anything. He’s just a dick with a weird sense of humor.

    • deathbird@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Masnick’s post is well put, but also a disturbing reminder of how much power nation-states can exert over the Internet.

    • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I mean, yeah we all knew he overpaid, but losing over 75%? I didn’t expect that.

      • Da Bald Eagul@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Twitter wasn’t profitable right? So most of the “value” is in the name of the product. Elon changed the name and added his signature to everything the platform was doing, completely changing the platform Twitter is. So yeah, I do get why 75% of the money is gone now.

        • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Changing the name of one of the most valuable brands isn’t something I’d expect even him to do.

    • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      The way to make it hurt is to establish a replacement that keeps discussions away from trolls and hate propaganda.