Silverchase@sh.itjust.works to Math Memes@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 27 days agoProof by fucking obviousnesssh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square66fedilinkarrow-up1376arrow-down114
arrow-up1362arrow-down1imageProof by fucking obviousnesssh.itjust.worksSilverchase@sh.itjust.works to Math Memes@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 27 days agomessage-square66fedilink
minus-squarepseudo@jlai.lulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·25 days ago Then again, I thought 1+1=2 is axiomatic (2 being the defined by having a count of one and then another one) So I don’t understand why Bertrand Russel had to spend 86 pages proving it from baser fundamentals. It is mathematic. Of course it has to be proved.
It is mathematic. Of course it has to be proved.