• Loucypher@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      23 天前

      if you wanted to run macOS on this then yes, it would definitely be ewaste

      • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        28
        ·
        23 天前

        I personally don’t share the same definition of e-waste. Having to install Linux, a custom ROM or modded software to make the machine fully usable doesn’t make it complete e-waste imo. Conputer users should have technical knowledge to do stuff like that.

        • Telorand@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          63
          ·
          23 天前

          That’s the point. Most users don’t know how to do that, can’t be bothered to learn, so this laptop would have been e-waste under most other circumstances.

          • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            23 天前

            I think their confusion comes from OPs title.

            Why is it “e-waste go brrrrrrr” when OP is presumably saying they’re keeping this laptop out of the machine? _ machine go brr is a dumb meme in the first place, people using it the wrong way makes it even dumberer.

            • FippleStone@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              21 天前

              Oh man I cannot stand it, it’s a tolerable meme format at best when used correctly, but I find it insufferable when it’s applied mindlessly like this

          • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            22 天前

            Yes but if a person uses a computer and doesn’t want to learn stuff, issues that come from it are (at least partially) their fault.

            • Telorand@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              22 天前

              Sure, but that’s kind of a nonsequitur to the question of whether this would have ended up as e-waste.

              A: Would this end up as e-waste?
              
              B: It's the end-users' fault if it does.
              
              A: Okay, so...would this end up as e-waste?
              

              We don’t literally know, because we can’t predict the future, but we can be reasonably certain that old tech like this laptop would have become e-waste in the hands of your average user, regardless of whether they should have been expected to take the time to learn how to prevent that or not.

        • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          23 天前

          Conputer users should have technical knowledge to do stuff like that.

          It’s not the 80s anymore. Normies are using computers now.

            • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              22 天前

              Happens. Cars used to need special skills to even get started and drive around. Now a five year old can start one and drive off if they can reach the pedals. But they won’t have any clue how it actually works.

        • RedWizard [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          22 天前

          Most corporations are not going to do that because they often standardize around products with known solutions for management that come with service guarantees. No one wants to support a small fleet of aging hardware running an os outside the dominant platform.