• glimse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 month ago

    His autism didn’t spark fear…saying the school would blow up if anyone looked in his backpack sparked fear. He should not have been arrested but c’mon, if a kid I just met said that to me I’d call the front office, too.

    he told his teacher he didn’t want anyone to look in his backpack […] When the teacher asked why, Ty responded, “Because the whole school will blow up,”

    Arresting him was overreacting. Perceiving his words as a threat was not

    • ieatpwns@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      He wasn’t wrong. Someone looked in his bag and the whole situation got blown up out of proportion over a bunny

    • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Some kid randomly saying that and you don’t know him, ok. But the school was aware he’s autistic, so why did they suddenly forget?

      • glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        I am saying the admins acted poorly but the teacher was justifiably scared.

        The teacher, who had only known Ty for one day, called a school administrator

    • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      saying the school would blow up if anyone looked in his backpack sparked fear

      If you can’t tell a serious threat from mouth noises coming from a 13 year old autistic boy, then I guess its good you presumably don’t work with children.

      • glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        You’re right, no 13 year old autistic boy has ever made a serious threat! It’s always totally obvious if threatening words from a stranger should be taken seriously or not. Teachers are also always given the full background on every kid in their classroom without exceptions so they should have ignored protocol when hearing a kid say their backpack is going to blow up.

        How could I forget that every single kid with malice in their heart fits the brooding edgelord mold from Columbine and that having autism totally precludes violent intentions?

        Teachers DO NOT GET PAID ENOUGH for that. And even if they were paid fairly, their job isn’t to assess and handle bomb threats.

        The teacher was 100% right to call the administrators. The administrators were 100% wrong to do anything more than gently educate him on his word choice.

    • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah - calling the admin was definitely the right thing to do. Even involving the police as reasonable (the whole world would be jumping all over the teachers and admin if they ignored it and something happened).

      But goddamn everything after that is a clusterfuck. This law is the perfect example of “well meaning but stupid” legislation that has side effects that were entirely foreseeable but somehow a “shock” to the people who voted for it.