MataVatnik@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 8 hours agoAnon questions our energy sectorslrpnk.netimagemessage-square88fedilinkarrow-up1392arrow-down166cross-posted to: greentext@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1326arrow-down1imageAnon questions our energy sectorslrpnk.netMataVatnik@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 8 hours agomessage-square88fedilinkcross-posted to: greentext@lemmy.ml
minus-squareblind3rdeye@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·3 hours ago only antimatter could provide more energy density, it’s insanely powerful. Nuclear energy indeed has very high energy per mass of fuel. But so what? Solar and wind power doesn’t even use fuel. So the energy density thing is a bit of a distraction.
Nuclear energy indeed has very high energy per mass of fuel. But so what? Solar and wind power doesn’t even use fuel. So the energy density thing is a bit of a distraction.