• GBU_28@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    Edit but in the spirit of conversation: Biden AND Harris are lame candidates that absolutely only maintain the status quo. As you say, voters are unhappy with that.

    Edit restructure

    I disagree with the conclusion that OMB isn’t valid reasoning. But it’s just one dudes opinion that I’ve laid out in the thread.

    Orange man bad was more then enough to pick a rock with a smiley face on it as alternative

    People will learn the consequences, regardless of what brought them in our kept them home.

    If folks fundamentally can’t play out the math on 2 choices in a FPTP where one is a serial rapist, anti abortion candidate, who is on record for wanting to accelerate Gaza, then I dunno what to say on that. “Status quo” starts looking pretty shiny, which is terrible, but the world we live in.

    But now we have trump, and a lot of folks get to say “they didn’t attract me”

    • Glytch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Orange man bad was more then enough to pick a rock with a smiley face on it as alternative

      It’s a logical argument and it’s a correct argument. Unfortunately it’s demonstrably not an effective argument, especially when it’s all you’re doing. The same thing happened in 2016 with Clinton thinking she was owed votes because Trump would be (and was, and will be again) a disaster for the US. Yet they still went with the same strategy anyway.

      I say this as someone who did make the “correct” choice of voting blue despite my moral objections to a lot of what she was saying. We will now all see the consequences of only barely trying to win an election against fascists.

      • GBU_28@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I am aligned with you here. Well put.

        To be clear, I have no love for the dnc or their strategies. I am not championing them as a model. Other commenters seem to think I’m simping for “blue maga” or some other shit.

        I’ve consistently argued for harm reduction in a limited outcome system.

        • Glytch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I agree with the harm reduction strategy, but I also understand people being apathetic with the choices they’re presented.

          Of course this means people should be more active and now is the time to start really pushing for ranked choice voting so we can maybe do something about the dominance of the two-party system.

          Screw trying to convince Democrats they need to start looking left. Force them to with the threat of new, actually progressive, parties.

          • GBU_28@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Bro you do words real good. Your closing statement is gold.

            Imo that work to build candidates start right now, and to circle back my issue with third party voices, they are crickets until right before he election