Vincent Oriedo, a biotechnology scientist, had just such a question. What lessons have been learned, he asked, from Harris’s defeat in this vital swing county in a crucial battleground state that voted for Joe Biden four years ago, and how are the Democrats applying them?

“They did not answer the question,” he said.

“It tells me that they haven’t learned the lessons and they have their inner state of denial. I’ve been paying careful attention to the influencers within the Democratic party. Their discussions have centred around, ‘If only we messaged better, if only we had a better candidate, if only we did all these superficial things.’ There is really a lack of understanding that they are losing their base, losing constituencies they are taking for granted.”

“We have set ourselves up for generational loss because we keep promoting from within leaders that that do not criticise the moneyed interests. They refuse to take a hard look at what Americans actually believe and meet those needs.”

  • MNByChoice@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    The only lesson is that unreliable voters can be ignored.

    People only ever emulate the winning individual, side, or group.

    There is no “They lost so next time they will cater to me.” There is a “I didn’t vote, so next time they will ignore me.”

    Edit: Don’t put words in my mouth. It makes uou sound stupider than your words do.

  • negativeyoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    The small concession is that Trump is almost undoubtedly going to trip over his dick, so we’ll probably end up with a blue wave of some sort in 2028. Nothing will change for the DNC and no lessons will be learned, so 2032 looks bleak as shit.

    We need to understand that Dems are not going to fight for anyone besides their donors. They’d rather lose than take pointers from someone like Bernie

  • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    2 days ago

    Trump pretty much won on optics alone and positioning himself once again as looking out for people despite not being true at all. Dems didn’t want to address people’s issues with the economy and did the weird thing of tap dancing for right Dick Cheney voters who don’t exist.

    Just stand for something, even if the risk of loss is high. It pays off in the end.

  • kandoh@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Every breakdown and postmortem i see make it pretty clear:

    If you paid close attention and were well-informed, you voted for Kamala.

    If you believe things aren’t true or didn’t pay close attention, you voted for Trump as a sort of totem for wealth and success, not because of a specific policy of his you like. He just represents making lots of money to you.

    Any grappling with what went wrong or improvements needed within the DNC first needs to reckon with the reality that people aren’t seeing left-wing messaging and are instead exposed to a fake version of leftism pushed constantly by right-wing actors on social media.

  • rayyy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    Corporations and Republicans control the media. Putin deployed psyops on the social media of the bar room and bowling alley crowd. They controlled the narrative and will continue to control it until people wake up and realize they have become wage slaves who have a shit-hole standard of living.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    In a capitalist society, the role of government should be to protect citizens from corporations.

    If nobody is willing to do that, what use are they?

  • pyrflie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Dems will keep losing until they figure out which demographics they can’t afford to betray.

    They thought LGBT and women would buy the last election and betrayed Unions, Nortenios, and Muslims. Like it wouldn’t have a consequence, then they lost the southwest (Nortenio) and midwest (Union and Muslim).

  • kipo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Left vs right or democrat vs republican — that framing is a distraction in this political reality. The war is between the 99% and the 1%. It’s the working class vs the billionaire class. Your republican neighbor may be a MAGA religious crazy, voting against his financial interests, but he’s been successfully manipulated by a corrupt party controlled by billionaires. Your other neighbor may ‘vote blue no matter who’, ignoring or ignorant to the fact that most democrats at the state and federal level are also influenced or bought by corporate interests and the 1%. These neighbors are clearly not the same, but they are both supporting the interests and agenda of a billionaire class that is oppressing them.

    That is not to say that republicans or religious extremism are not threats — they very much are — but they have been allowed to gain power due to a broken and corrupt system of government.

    The system is broken because unlimited money gets funneled into politics. It’s destroyed our checks and balances, as well as the incentive structure for our judges and our representatives — most of whom no longer have a primary interest in representing the 99% of us. We are being taxed, robbed, poisoned, oppressed and enslaved by our own government, without even proper representation to show for it.

    We cannot expect that our elected representatives will act in our best interests; they require our constant input and scrutiny of their actions. Either we as a people become more involved with politics at all levels of government, or we start a revolution. The problem of corruption in all levels of our government will not be solved by the corrupted. A continuation and increase of wealth inequality will destroy this country.

    The corporate-backed fascist MAGA-America regime starts tomorrow, but we are not powerless. The 99% has power. We must come together, organize, educate, exercise empathy and patience with one another, and take action; we can take back control. We have to.

  • MellowYellow13@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Neoliberalism is done, it’s fucked. The liberals wanted and thought they could pull another Bernie and people would just go with it, fuck that.

  • Stern@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    2 days ago

    We have set ourselves up for generational loss because we keep promoting from within leaders that that do not criticise the moneyed interests

    Evergreen quote-

    “It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.” - Upton Sinclair

  • Cyrus Draegur@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    The Democrat aristocracy do not care about winning.

    They only care about marketing the disaster of their losses so that they can launder billions of dollars in “vote blue” spam campaigns.

    All those donations are going somewhere - to “consultancy firms”. To “ad agencies”. And then they get to enjoy kickbacks from this mutual relationship.

    THEY DON’T NEED TO WIN TO RAKE IN BILLIONS.

    and so they don’t even try.

  • Whirling_Cloudburst@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    115
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    People want real fucking change. One man stood up against a massive evil health insurance company and regular people from all sides of the political spectrum support him.

    Dems could have won if they were willing to do the same and no one would even need to be hurt to do it.

    Naturally, there are a host of other problems mentioned in this thread. The trouble is that there is too much free $peech from the ruling class in politics.

    • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      People want real fucking change.

      So they helped to elect Trump for a non-consecutive term lol

    • oakey66@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      62
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think for people like me, the biggest fuck you was from Obama. He ran on hope and change. He ran on at least a public option. And he went into the office and literally shut down the ground operation that swept him into his position and then basically spent 8 years appeasing Republicans despite the fact that people wanted transformational change. That’s why they picked him over Clinton. He delivered Romneycare, bank bailouts, and drone wars.

      • immutable@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        56
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        And when people wonder why it’s so hard to get out the vote, I think this is a key reason why. I’m old enough to have gone to Obama’s rallies, knock on doors for his campaign as a volunteer, vote for him and watch with joy as he won.

        Hope and change. After the George W Bush presidency and the war on terror, it finally seemed like it was time for the pendulum to swing back.

        And then every issue they came to the table with a position already in the center in hopes of appealing to the republicans who would then hold their breath and kick their feet and then it would slide further and further to the right until they were holding up romneycare as a progressive victory while also getting completely destroyed in the court of public opinion for passing romneycare.

        I knew a lot of people that were very excited for Obama the candidate and completely disillusioned by Obama the president.

        And I await the apologists to come out and tell me how he had to do it this way, they only had a super majority for a few weeks. Sure if the republicans have the slimmest majority they rewrite the tax codes and give away trillions to the wealthiest, and if they are in the minority they still somehow get their policies passed. But when democrats have power, well you see, government takes time. They can’t possibly just have the bill ready and call for a vote, you see, that’s just not how it works.

        You can only tell people so many times. Vote blue and we promise this time, this time, we will make it better. I know last time we didn’t, but it was because of the blue dogs, or Joe Lieberman, or Joe Manchin. Sure, we have no plan to get rid of those people or other spoilers and we will doggedly support them in every primary… but somehow this time will be different.

        • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          I honestly wonder if at this point, candidates would be better off pursuing progressive legislation by running a Republicans.

          Ideological purity doesn’t matter worth a shit to Republicans. See Republican voters loving the ACA while hating Obamacare. The party that is supposedly pro free market now openly endorses tariffs and regulation on business to advance a host of culture war bugbears. Republicans are not libertarians; the base especially isn’t ideologically opposed to government programs.

          I could see a progressive running for the Republican nomination, a latter-day Teddy Roosevelt. And since the Republicans have become the party of the working class, while Democrats are the party of lawyers and big business, the attack lines write themselves. “Democrats are in bed with the insurance industry!” “Democrats want to pick your pocket instead of giving you healthcare!” “Democrats can’t pass a health plan without lining the pockets of their donors!”

          The Republican party has proven itself to be much more susceptible to disruption from outside charismatic figures. The Republican base has far more control over the Republican party than the Democratic base does of the Democratic party. In 2016, the establishment Republicans tried to shoot Trump down, but their base overpowered them, and Trump took over the party. Bernie tried the same thing in 2016 and 2020, but the DNC was far more powerful and able to resist this outside takeover.

          I really think that now may be the time for a return of progressive Republicans in the mold of Teddy Roosevelt. Promise to fix healthcare and break up big businesses left and right. Throw a bone to the right by promising to exclude illegal immigrants from the healthcare law (which they would never be eligible for anyway.) Hell, you could even write it so it didn’t exclude coverage for abortion and trans healthcare. If someone points that out, just lie and say that your plan does include these exclusions. It’s not like the truth on such things matters anymore. Sell it in simple terms the common man can understand.

          I really do wonder if at this point, progressive candidates might gain more traction by running as Republicans. The Republican party is not ideologically libertarian, and it has proven far more receptive to outsiders and new ideas than the Democratic party.

        • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          31
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          And I await the apologists to come out and tell me how he had to do it this way, they only had a super majority for a few weeks. Sure if the republicans have the slimmest majority they rewrite the tax codes and give away trillions to the wealthiest, and if they are in the minority they still somehow get their policies passed. But when democrats have power, well you see, government takes time. They can’t possibly just have the bill ready and call for a vote, you see, that’s just not how it works.

          Every single time!

          I still find it frustrating to hear this line every single time. Like somehow every single member of congress during that time was hyper focused on the ACA bill, couldn’t have pushed for their own legislation to be pushed forward.

          I’ve had plenty of wake up calls, and every time I do, someone calls me weird for the dog whistles becoming fog horns.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          And I await the apologists to come out and tell me how he had to do it this way, they only had a super majority for a few weeks.

          They will all be miraculously absent when Republicans change the senate rules to get rid of the filibuster.

        • piconaut@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          2 days ago

          I remember watching the debates during the Obama campaign and thinking “this guy is just as pro big business as the republicans”. The only candidate who was talking about the need to limit the political power of corporations/finance was Ron Paul.

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Kamala was running on “Isn’t Trump a weirdo?”, but that was working so she stopped.

        The DNC does not want to win if it means causing actual change.

        • nomy@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          2 days ago

          They pivoted from “Trump is a weirdo” to “Dick Cheney likes us!” like the absolute morons they are.

          • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            2 days ago

            I love how “We were too woke!”, and I"m like “Woke? Is that what you call having Thanksgiving with Penis Cheney?”

      • futatorius@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        and drone wars

        I’d have been fine with the US killing even more Al-Qaida and Taliban members, even those that happened to be US citizens fighting alongside their comrades in a combat zone. Every single one of them would be about right. And if you’re squeamish about drones, let’s be real, you are really just squeamish about warfare, because every other form of killing in warfare is just as brutal and most are far more indiscriminate.

        Also, as soon as Trump got in the first time, he changed rules of engagement to take less account of civilian casualties.

        • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          22 hours ago

          iirc technically Obama reduced counting of drone strike civillian casualties, Trump just stopped counting all together.

        • orcrist@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Maybe you didn’t read that comment? I think you got it backwards.