When China’s prodigious tech influencer, Naomi Wu, found herself silenced, it wasn’t just the machinery of a surveillance state at play. Instead, it was a confluence of state repression and the sometimes capricious attention of a Western audience that, as she asserts, often views Chinese activists more as ideological tokens than as genuine human beings.

  • elouboub@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not sure I understand… why would the Chinese keep somebody they are racist against in the country? To continue being racist against them? Wouldn’t they want them to leave? Or are they being treated as free labor?

    • scurry@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m guessing it’s also not feasible to get her a visa on the other side, meaning nowhere to go. I also wouldn’t be surprised if her family being more closely watched and targeted if they leave isn’t also part of why they feel they can’t.

    • wahming@monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Every victim of suppression that leaves is a possible dissident operating from abroad