• jonne@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I believe there was a court order. I think people should however be upset that they’re selling a safe that apparently has a backdoor in it.

    • confusedwiseman@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It wasn’t terribly clear, but the paperwork sounded pretty flimsy at best. While I like the thought the company shouldn’t install a back door, but I’d bet they all pretty much have one.

      • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The federalist is a alt-right wing rag, so I would take any of their claims with a large chunk of salt.

        No “news” org that unprompted refers to the FBI as the “disgraced federal law enforcement agency” when talking about legally executing a warrant on a jan 6th terrorist is worth the electrons its printed on.

        And just for an extra dash of “no duh, our agenda is clear” they have a fear mongering chyron in red flashing at the top of the site about Hillary clinton, a politician that’s been retired for 7 yrs.

        • confusedwiseman@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, totally fair. I wouldn’t ever try to disagree with any of that.

          I’m honestly trying to avoid the cluster that is everything going on and look at the safe company.

          I think I’m upset that I had higher hopes for Liberty as a safe company. Partially because they did comply, but wholly because there was a way to comply. That kind of money on a safe should lead to, call a locksmith that can break in.