PugJesus@lemmy.dbzer0.com to NonCredibleDefense@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoWhat do you mean mechs are non-credible?lemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square68fedilinkarrow-up1416arrow-down111
arrow-up1405arrow-down1imageWhat do you mean mechs are non-credible?lemmy.dbzer0.comPugJesus@lemmy.dbzer0.com to NonCredibleDefense@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square68fedilink
minus-squaresteventhedev@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up23arrow-down2·1 year agoMy headcanon is that mechs require a few things to be a viable weapons platform: Orbital bombardment is not a viable tactic FTL travel is cheap and easy for non-living matter FTL travel is expensive and/or prohibitively dangerous for living tissue Artificial intelligence / fly by wire is not viable If 1 isn’t true, then toss rocks at them from space and pick up the pieces later. If 2 isn’t true, then it would be easier to train local forces and use commando teams If 3 isn’t true, then it would be cheaper, easier, and more effective to deploy rapid response forces of mixed armored infantry. If 4 isn’t true, then send your swarms of autonomous weapons platforms to kill anything that moves. I’m sure there’s a few other reasons why Urbanmechs would make more sense than the larger platforms, but at some point you just gotta enjoy the mecha
My headcanon is that mechs require a few things to be a viable weapons platform:
If 1 isn’t true, then toss rocks at them from space and pick up the pieces later.
If 2 isn’t true, then it would be easier to train local forces and use commando teams
If 3 isn’t true, then it would be cheaper, easier, and more effective to deploy rapid response forces of mixed armored infantry.
If 4 isn’t true, then send your swarms of autonomous weapons platforms to kill anything that moves.
I’m sure there’s a few other reasons why Urbanmechs would make more sense than the larger platforms, but at some point you just gotta enjoy the mecha