Controversial AI art piece from 2022 lacks human authorship required for registration.

  • Skua@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    He did? This article mentions it only briefly, but he talked about it more when it was first getting attention for winning the competition. Is this something he did in the court case that you’ve read elsewhere?

    But also, if you used Midjourney at the time that the image was made, you’ll know that you did not get an image like that straight out of it

    • paintbucketholder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      This wasn’t a court case.

      This was a copyright application.

      The Copyright Office asked him to provide them with an unedited version of the image generated by Midjourney in order to determine how much (human) work went into the final version.

      Allen refused to provide them with an unedited version, so the Copyright Office had no way to verify how much or how little work was actually done by the artist compared to work that was done by the AI, so they had to assume that the vast majority of the work was done without any human artistic contribution.

      They were essentially forced to reject his copyright application because he refused to provide evidence that he actually did any kind of creative artistic work.