Grayox@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoCheers my dudeslemmy.mlimagemessage-square68fedilinkarrow-up11.73Karrow-down161
arrow-up11.67Karrow-down1imageCheers my dudeslemmy.mlGrayox@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square68fedilink
minus-squareInputZero@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up10·1 year agoAnd in a few more decades neither will unions. I’d laugh if it wasn’t so sad.
minus-squareusernamesaredifficul [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·1 year agothat’s not remotely true. The union movement is quite robust and actively serves a real need. The only thing that could actually kill the union movement would be a fully communist society and unions subsequently becoming redundant
minus-squareexplodicle@local106.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoSorry if this is a stupid question. What do we do about goverments simply shutting them down? In my country the rail workers needed to strike, and then congress said no.
And in a few more decades neither will unions. I’d laugh if it wasn’t so sad.
that’s not remotely true. The union movement is quite robust and actively serves a real need. The only thing that could actually kill the union movement would be a fully communist society and unions subsequently becoming redundant
Sorry if this is a stupid question.
What do we do about goverments simply shutting them down? In my country the rail workers needed to strike, and then congress said no.