I have a subscription only because it was added on to another service. I wouldn’t be surprise if they padded their numbers by giving out accounts as paired deals.
I have a subscription only because it was added on to another service. I wouldn’t be surprise if they padded their numbers by giving out accounts as paired deals.
Your starting origin does little besides dialogue options. So outside of the intro you can ignore all differences.
The game is limited till you complete the heist with Dex. That heist is also story heavy so just be prepared.
Your best option is to get Phantom Liberty. You can skip to the mid-point of the game that way and just ignore the story and fight stuff. The whole city is opened.
There is no real post-game so finishing the story isn’t important of you want to mess around.
Story does have some great moments so slow down the fast forward button now and then ;)
This is the best way forward. If GOG had more games it would change the industry. More companies need to partner with them.
You are correct. The Hyrule Historia outlines the game and the split in Ocarina of Time:
There’s a lot going on there. Very impressive
So if Tim Burton got the rights to Sailor Moon…
Ahh yes, I clearly see Windows in this image
Shit… this just made me think that every skeleton I ever fought in a game was really just the remains of a hero who fought so hard that even in death their body continued to fight and challenge the world.
Why is everyone on a race to the bottom nowadays? Almost every action a consumer makes is becoming monetized.
I guess it is a thing
Have AIs ever done a magic eye photo?
The ones I looked up didn’t really work like the old fashion ones.
The butterfly-esque creature is perfect!
That’s awesome. Isometric is great for exploring but always hated combat with it. Animation is really smooth too.
March 22
Elves, minotaurs, colossuses, and gorgons! This looks really good.
Sadly you’re right. We at least need the basic rule of labeling content that used AI
AI can be such a great tool, but they just use it for this crap… We need regulation
Why use any human-like image then? A lot of amateur fashion designer on instagram use mannequins or busts. The models are serving a purpose. Removing them means someone loses a job.
If we look at this from top-down you’re right because the company is saving a cost. But from the bottom-up, you’ve just become more expendable. This leads into the arguments others have been making, what happens when eventually people can’t work? And why should we use technology to serve the few and not the many?
They frame this article in such a weird way. Like replacing the models and their jobs was justified because they had egos etc…
I can see similar framing used to replace other workers because they want to be paid fairly or do something drastic like take bathroom breaks… :D
So Taylor Swift is going to buy it next?