Dr. Manhattan, obviously.

I like when they go to Naboo.

Obvious Plant?

Are these the crips and bloods?

Agreed. That was amazing.

Oh good one. RIP to Peter and Lemmy.

Oh sorry. I agree with everything you said in your reply. I was just being stupid. I quite liked your post, and I myself am not religious. Mainly just wanted to mention old Gregg.

Great post, I had a quite sensible chuckle when I read it.

What’re you doing in my swamp, mother-licker?

We do not. But maybe he created the funk.

Pasteurization doesn’t boil the milk though…

“The village’s decline has instead been attributed to its distance from clean drinking water and unsuitable soil for cultivation.”

2spooky4me.

But really? What’s so creepy about this page?

Make sure to use every part though. Prostitute stock is the best.

Many horror movies that I didn’t watch around Halloween.

Direct action maybe?

Lemmy.

Maybe he was actually crucified, but if he was, it was not for our sins. That part is as real as the Easter bunny or Old Gregg.

Woah, no need to get so angry, I’m merely asking questions (which you’re not providing answers to).

I’m refuting the one thing you’ve mentioned multiple times; the “contaminated” source of fluoride. You make it seem like it’s dangerous because “it comes from the smoke stack scrubbers of fertilizer plants.” Why do you keep bringing this up?

Since you brought it, up have you studied this at a university level? While I have not directly studied the fluoridation of water in university, I have studied chemistry. That is where all my questions are coming from. I’m not concerned about this from a dental perspective.

While that article is peer-reviewed and has sources, it’s pertaining to a very specific region, and also is published in a fairly obscure journal with a trash impact factor.

This is also the first I’ve heard mention of pre-eruption benefits of fluoride. I’ve never stated I believe this, and have not heard anyone else mention this in favour of fluoridation.

Also as I mentioned in a previous comment, I am in no way saying the individual with a PhD in a social science is “full of shit”. I’m just saying the article is an opinion piece, and reads like a conspiracy theorist wrote it. Think Charlie and Pepe Silvia from IASIP.

Many scientists (research-based) go into public policy as well. Mainly because they’re capable of thinking critically and are able to contribute to policy in their area of expertise.

Also for the third time, are you a scientist, or have any scientific background?

Doesn’t questioning all these things you’re saying display critical thinking?

Well firstly, you did not provide any specific contaminants. You did mention heavy metals, which are inherently in normal ground water. They are also controlled, as I mentioned in my last post.

Can you provide a source that states there’s no processing of “it”? Can you also state what exactly “it” is? NaF, HF, SiCl4, or something else?

Also, for the third time, are you some sort of scientist? Especially one who would have knowledge of actual chemistry?

If I don’t get at least somewhat of a semblance of intelligence in your reply, this is over, and you should really try to accept people trying to educate you on topics you clearly don’t know.

As I’ve said at least a couple times, I’d be happy to provide multiple sources proving F- in water is safe. I will even help walk you through these sources. I’m all for educating people.

So, please don’t reply with some stupid shit stated in that shitpost of an article you linked.

I’m genuinely trying to help/educate. So please take me up on the offer if you would like to.

I wouldn’t enjoy it, but I think I’d have to go back to the trenches in WW1. Just to experience the horrific conditions that so many people experienced. Hearing the history, it just seems so incomprehensible.

Also observing both sides and everything around it would be interesting.

Edit: either what I said, or Hannibal with his elephants in the mountains.