“That was the time I realised it was a waste of everything talking about it.”

I, from the UK, once had a ‘conversation’ about gun control with an American on Reddit. What brought this about was the day before a 9 year old girl was killed by a stray bullet from a drive-by. One moment she was in her bedroom doing some homework, and the next she was dead.

After a lot of back and forth with him getting more flummoxed and aggressive he then said something like “If she was outside playing like a normal kid then she wouldn’t have been killed.”
Yep, he blamed her.

That was the time I realised it was a waste of everything talking about it.

They’ve just landed after jumping the wheelchair off a ramp. Obvious, when you think about it…

I actually like the film. However what annoyed me about that part is this:
You’ve got a bunch of -mostly- super smart people. (Cooper not so much as he’s ‘only’ the pilot, but the others wouldn’t be there if they weren’t very clever).
And they also know and have talked about time dilation, and that every second down there is longer -about a day- than on Earth.
Yet they just gung ho it.

They don’t really work out beforehand how long the person (miller, I think) would’ve been down there and what things would be like from their point of view.
No. It’s “uggg, signal. Follow signal. Most follow beep. Beep beep, hehe, beep”.

And then they didn’t really have a plan for when they landed. They just landed and went out for a walk like it’s a Sunday afternoon stroll in the park.
On a planet with such excessive time dilation.

And that’s not the worse part. No then, THEN, when shit hits the fan they send the robot (TARS, I think) to very speedily pick up the trapped person.

Now I’m no rocket scientist, but even I would want to know everything about that planet. The estimated time of how long miller (?) was there. And the quickest way to get the info needed, then get off asap.

They should’ve “Okay, time dilation is going to fuck us up. So we follow the signal. Land as close as poss. Send out the robot to pick up the person and info etc. Then gtfo of there sharpish. Agreed. Nice. Let’s do this.”
But nooooo, it’s… let’s half arse it. Go for a fucking walk. Fuck things up. Then, and only then, panic but then do things correctly.

Nolan, wtf were you thinking?

Now now, there’s no need to be so evil!!

Start up your Bluetooth speaker. (Buy one if you haven’t got one. It doesn’t have to be good, just loud.)
Ramp it up to 11.
Start the most annoying obnoxious sound you have, (that you have already downloaded).
Stand next to the person playing the shitty music and aim the speaker at then.
When they complain about your annoying noise you reply, “You started it.”

Awh, I like stick pics. The girthier, the better…

Right there with you. I’ve been 27 for a good few years now, before that I was 26 for about 5 years.

I’ve got a book about the history of trains, but I’ve not seen anything about this. Any idea what I’m doing wrong?

I don’t mind the sticky carpets. I don’t mind the shitty seats. I don’t mind other people making certain noises, eating etc. And if a person is looking at their phone then I don’t mind as long as that’s it, just looking.

What I do mind, what I absolutely cannot abide, what I find completely unacceptable is the person behind knocking my chair. Once or twice when first sitting down, or when getting up to go to toilet etc is fine. But that’s it.
There is no acceptable reason to keep on doing it. NO REASON.

“But I get numb and need to fidget.” Then sit behind an empty fucking chair.
“But I’m freakishly tall.” That’s your problem, but when you continually knock other people’s seats it is now their problem as well. Move to an aisle seat, or sit behind a seat that’s empty.

“But I’m oblivious to other people, also I selfishly don’t care if I’m an annoying twat.” Exactly. Don’t be like that.

"But I (insert any fucking bullshit you want to try to bullshit about here). SIT BEHIND A FUCKING EMPTY SEAT. It’s that fucking simple.

I’m no pervert. Anyways I’ve got to go, I’m going to see if I can experience a Dickcissel, then I’m off to my mates to see his Himalayan snowcock…

Ok, buckle up, it’s time for an essay.

Firstly, it sounds like your burner, like mine, doesn’t like too much timber inside of it on the first burn of the day.
Remember that everything is ‘cold’. Your flue, the fire bricks, the burner. And all that needs to get warmed asap and will ‘steal’ that heat from the fire. Which will make the flames choke, especially when compared with a hot burner.

Plus if you have to turn the log to keep it burning then you don’t have enough heat (embers, or flames) under it to keep it on fire.
And that’s even if it’s not the first fire of the day.
The only time I need to mess with a log is if they have fallen against the glass.

I try to keep about an inch of ash in the firebox for insulation. And try to keep an inch of embers running so the logs get hot enough to burn.

We tried numerous ways of starting fires.
Bottom up.
Logs in an arrow shape facing to the back of the burner with kindling at the front.
Logs like a teepee, with kindling under it.
Logs as a proper V shape with kindling under and over.
But every time it would struggle and/or smoke a lot.

Now, like I said, we just use kindling with the top down method. We put in 4 inch sized firelighters under the top piece of kindling and fire it up. 99 percent of the time it’ll start no problems, and far less smoke.
If we put anything other than kindling in it will be very small logs, almost branches sized, nothing more.

Once the fire is going with a decent amount of embers then we can chuck the logs in but leave the air controls open and, again, 99 percent of the time it’ll catch. Then we will just shut the controls a bit later as needed.

You need 3 things to start and keep a fire going: ignition(fire). Fuel. Oxygen(air).
Too much, or too little, will cause it to go boom. Go out. Or smoke.
Having the correct amounts of each will, usually, mean you have a good fire.

You want to eliminate as much smoke as possible. It’ll cause creosote, etc, and if that catches ignites you’ll have a chimney fire. Which, obviously, is bad.

Then there’s the logs. If they aren’t ‘dry’ you’ll also struggle to keep things burning because you are adding another element (sap, water) to it all.
The ‘wetter’ the wood the more air you’ll need to keep the same sized log on fire.

If you haven’t got a moisture tester for timber then you defo should get one. Anything under 20% is great.

Logs. We burn anything. Hard, soft. It doesn’t matter. As long as it is dry it burns.
If we have hardwood we’ll leave that until the fire is going. We’ll start with kindling, then a few softwood then hardwood.
If the fire is hot enough it won’t smoke.

I’ve got to go to work. Any questions then just ask

We used to have the problem of smoke, etc, escaping in to the room. We changed how and when we opened the door, and how we loaded it up.

Now we use the top down method to start a fire, it produces less smoke.
We use just kindling to start, which is best for my burner.
And we leave the air controls open for all of the first burn of the day.

When the first load is down to embers -btw, embers don’t smoke- we leave the air controls open.
Get the next logs ready.
Open the door slowly.
Then load up again quickly, but without just chucking the logs in.
We leave the air controls open until the new load is burning nice then shut them as needed.

On the next load we do the same routine.

Now we only ever get smoke escaping in to the room if we have to open the door during the first part of a fresh load of logs, such as if the logs fall incorrectly and touch the glass.

Haha…forget about what?

“When I work…” Bozo Boris is lying yet again.

I was subbed there when it was called something not so wholesome.

Them- “btw, you’ve pronounced that word incorrectly.”
You- “THAT’S RACIST. You are full of hate and ignorance!”