Probably just some cloaked Klingons

oo rah noos

“U” is not pronounced like “you” at all. “Noos” is also pretty off.

The dev builds are actually very recent but finding a cheap hardware is still not that easy. The forums are a great place to start, I guess.

thanks, that’s a great starting point. It seems the SanDisk players aren’t easily available anymore but I’ll look for the other compatible devices.

While it’s easy to prove rigorously I think the easiest way to think about it is to think what number/numbers could go between 0.9 repeating and 1.
I guess that it also requires a second thought experiment that if no numbers can go between two numbers, those two numbers must be the same.

edit: this might be even easier:

1/3 = 0.333… -> multiply both sides by 3
3/3 = 0.999…
1 = 0.999…

If anyone wants pictures:

https://blogs.sas.com/content/graphicallyspeaking/2021/05/20/myth-busting-maine-is-closest-us-state-to-africa/

Talking out of my ass here but I guess the initial information from the eyes goes to many pathways and reaches both and more. It’s just a question of which ones react.

So I read the article and the lawsuit has nothing to do with my question. It’s more about precedent and actually finding out what the laws are if everything is as claimed.

Still think detectability is an interesting question.

I didn’t read the article but does it say anything about detectability? If I claim I created it who can prove an AI did?

YSalsoK that many sites block these email addresses when trying to sign up. especially the bigger providers of such services.

i hear the people who created meth made a new drug. might try it for fun/curiosity…

at least in the near future.