deleted by creator

When I was growing up it was called “STOP CRYING ITS NOT THAT HARD WHY CANT YOU JUST GET THIS”

Hahaha good times…. Goooood times.

If this But we’re hoping to have a NSFW lemmy image that would implement a community level no-federation. This would allow the instance owners to say “I do not want this community’s content sent on the federated platform” - at which point, you could run the instance, host your loli, and just don’t share it with us.

I mean, it’s your world over there. The shit we’re taking a stance on is mostly legally gray as all hell though so be careful. Also you run the risk of people/instances defederating on principal of “they’re into loli we don’t want anything to do with them”

I think the “admin team” is pretty active, and since the instance is more specialized, you can simply bring it up to us in the matrix, message one of us directly, etc.

We have been discussing “rogue mods” as an issue too - and also community creation/moderation expectations.

It’s definitely something we want to get right

This is a good point. Currently only admins can “purge” and so we’ll need to implement a mechanism that gives mods a way to delete, prevent modlog link to the source image, and request admin purge. I’ll add this to our list.

Hentai beastiality is in our estimation, yes.

I’d like to add that we are specifically looking into improved community identification methods. One on the table is a “nsfw+” concept for topics that may not be “mainstream” but aren’t “illegal” - scat, pee, hentai beast, etc. These we would rather not show “on the main feed” or maybe even not federate, but we’re not opposed to hosting. It’s just that we want to make the instance appealing to the regular person. For those who want their “extreme” content - as long as it’s legal, I think we all agree we don’t necessarily mind it.

I’m open to hearing the community on this. With that said, “loli/shota” content where the object of eroticism is specifically that “they are a prepubescent child” will never be allowed. Don’t start with that.

not necessarily, but we would rather not have bot content. Remember, no one is making money on this instance, and I don’t really get what the point of bot content is other than to “provide content” - if the idea is to generate “karma” to then sell the account then that is no bueno. But people who want to provide content to their com, I don’t necessarily mind that… it’s a weird issue. I just don’t get why someone would bot content maliciously

It’s impossible to please everyone, tend to our jobs, and tend to our families and lives. Concessions will always be made. I don’t know how wikipedia handles all that, but I don’t see how we can do that.

There is a matrix channel for public lemmynsfw discourse, https://matrix.to/#/#lemmynsfw:matrix.org - there’s not a lot of activity there but if you have questions or want a more direct line with us, that’s where we are. We can make a mod specific room and invite folks to have a mod-centric discussion if you think that’s helpful.

But please, please, PLEASE remember that everyone is volunteering their time, and respect for one another is the most important part of this entire process.

I’m not sure why this would be happening. I’ll send a DM and maybe we can track it down.

This is a core lemmy enhancement. I don’t believe this is currently on their radar. I will add it to ours and see what that would take. It might not be feasible to implement on our instance alone but if we can work it out I’ll try to get it merged into lemmy.

I don’t speak for the entire admin team, but I don’t think we have any interest in policing the community creation provided they have enough moderators to prevent abuse compared to their level of activity (re: huge communities need more mods than small)

We are looking into users who create communities en-masse and are not active.

I think it’s mostly up to the community moderators to determine whether or not they want that content and how they will police it. As long as it doesn’t break site rules (new rules and clarification coming soon) then it’s not really something we want to micromanage.

With that said, link spamming is def not ok. I’m open to suggestions on how we can build out the toolchain that can ensure a good quality of posts.

So I’m not really an “admin” - I’m a sysadmin/developer who was given the role of admin so I can make sure all systems (including modlog, reportings, and other tools) work as we adjust them for this instance’s very specific needs.

Padded got banned because he was trying to sabotage the efforts of an entirely volunteer group including revealing our hosting provider. We are not a “non profit organization” - lemmynsfw is a volunteer instance being run on donations. People need to understand that this is no one’s “job” and yet it’s literally taking a ton of our time. I’ve spent so many hours pouring over lemmy code, system configurations, working with the mod tool group, brainstorming, writing code, and trying to help the real admins where I can…

And seriously, no one is being paid for this, donations barely cover server costs, and any excess donations are being saved because it’s anticipated that server costs will continue to rise while donations don’t. Besides, I don’t think any of us WANT to be paid for fear of reprisal from our respective governments for “making money” off serving pornography.

When the creator put out his call for help, a bunch of us stepped up to try to keep the server alive, but this is not an easy instance to run. Please understand that.

I expect we’ll need to patch our own tools, the nsfw angle is very specific that the core lemmy devs probably don’t want to deal with. Let me know how I can assist and where

Lol I don’t think I was here yet for that, but that makes sense. The other part of the patch was lazy loading content which I think was merged into the core codebase? So it makes sense that most of that was eliminated.

Still, I was hoping to see more adjustments that would pertain specifically to keeping content moderation easier given the inherent difficulty this instance faces

Ok so I don’t actually see any major change to the codebase there that helps protect the instance owner. The js patch doesn’t seem to be working right, I don’t see those blur/autoload controls in my sidebar on desktop. And to the server the only commit is apparently to “show nsfw by default”.

I think you would be wise to consider more patching to handle things like auto-purge on certain reports, ensure that deleted content is actually deleted from the server, etc. I haven’t reviewed the full lemmy codebase but I’m not convinced it’s going to be enough to keep things on the up-and-up in an instance like this.

The ui version in the footer says “UI: 0.18.0-nsfwpatch” - i assume there is a nsfw server patch too. Have you found those repos? We should check the code in there and make sure content is handled appropriately

I do sysadmin and software dev I can help where needed but I cannot provide hosting. Are you sure you’re willing to take on the responsibilities of moderating against illegal content?

I don’t know the tools available through Lemmy but we need strong controls again CP, rape, etc with effective logging and fast response times to takedown requests.

I have absolutely no interest in the front side admin (content moderation, etc) but if we can find hosting in a country that won’t send me to prison for being a part of this, I can do most sysadmin of backend.

Whatever admin team develops from this feel free to dm me and we can discuss how that would work.