Just an old retired guy who’s still a leftist.
A perfect example of “give the people what they think they want, and they’ll make something entirely unusable.”
I’m not talking about a long-ago problem. I’m talking about a current install of Ubuntu.
I’m a very casual Linux user and in my experience, I’ve NEVER had a problem with a documented solution that didn’t require going down a rabbit hole of other references.
Something like this: “To get the trackpad to work with Ubuntu, make sure you’ve installed the hergelbergelXX package.” (No link, find it on your own!)
Visit the HergelBergelXX page. To install Hergelbergel on Ubuntu, you must install the framisPortistan Package Manager. (No link!)
On the FramisPortistan GitHub readme, we discover it requires the JUJU3 database system to be installed. “JUJU3 may cause conflicts with installed USB devices under Ubuntu” JUJU2, which shipped with Ubuntu, is no longer supported. Also we recommend Archie&Jughead Linux over other distributions.
And this essentially never stops.
All of this is comparatively a happy result—I actually DID post a question on linuxnoobs about getting my trackpad to work with Ubuntu… and have not had a single reply. I have no idea how to find out how to make it work.
I wish I could say this is great, but it’s an unreadable mess. Looks like EEDT.
Zoom in and look at the roofs. They look cartoonish.
That’s really odd. Because when you zoom in, it very much looks like someone has hand drawn replacement roofs in some graphics program.
Why so photoshopped?
I could have gone and made it fit
That woulda been ever so lit.
But the effort was much
And the payoff was such,
I just didn’t bother to try it.
You want to be a poet,
And sought a place to show it.
You picked a strange host
And thread for your post,
This URL would be more fit!
well… I’m not. 🍏
It’s mainly about no Nazis.
Amcrest is all up in your business.
Think you replied to the wrong person. I don’t like or recommend Amcrest.
If I recall correctly, they straight up said that any program that supports their standard text presentation object will support rewrite.
How can anyone read any of this? The graphic is unreadable to me.
I’ve owned a bunch of Foscam cameras, a sub-brand owned by Amcrest.
Amcrest and its Foscam sub-brand seem very interested in getting access to your cameras, have less capable and less convenient software, and the cameras themselves seem less well built than Reolink.
I bought a half a dozen V1 Wyze cams, and at least two of them have failed. I won’t touch that brand again. I also would never have used Wyze at all except for the exploit that allowed custom firmware installation for real local access and control.
And probably four times the quality. If I could go back in time and choose Reolink for every camera I have, I would. In a heartbeat.
I think the first step would be to learn how to spell the company’s name. Or prevent autocorrect from messing up.
Either way, really.