Lol, 2.5 inches is over 2 feet?
Lol, 2.5 inches is over 2 feet?
I learned about it from my father… :'(
Throw in at least a hot pepper or two. I bet you can swing a carolina reaper in the middle of the block.
Well, the easy choice is the right choice. Squat down, and wrap your lips around the pole as it penetrates the hole. You’re going to be the grapefruit, honey.
Shoot, one of Alaska’s biggest northern settlements, if not the biggest, is an oil work camp. Look up Deadhorse / Prudhoe Bay. The road up there is totally worth taking if you’re into birdwatching or really rugged roughing it.
So what is it like compared to Guru maps? I’ve been using that as my primary for a while.
Well, yeah, but in the reverse…
"Boss hitting for 90% and sometimes one-shotting me in every fight.
Me and mah boy paladins repeatedly hitting one guy and healing so that he stacks up buffs and one-shots the boss.
Blizzard: Horrified stoner man"
Lol, physiologists say hi, and they need that natural log function you’ve been hiding back.
I’ve seen that line about the “man breaking, the horse splashing” somewhere on Lemmy in the past week. I never knew it was a quote or where it was from. Neato. The fellow clearly had some interesting insights.
That would be worse. Anime stylized faces do not work in the 3d space. I’d imagine we’d see a new trend of fancy molded art to match each car’s look and personality…
Ah, who am I kidding? Some exec will just put fucking smileys on the car.
I just use a value ranking system and rapidly sort variables until I reach the highest possible value.
Women>Men
Pop colors > blending (red is greater than brown, etc.)
Interesting features > bland (So a dude with a scar registers higher than a dude without)
Anomalies > expecteds (a top hat is more interesting than a ball cap)
There’s probably some other minor variations that account for my choices. Thinking about it, the preference for women may be due to them having more eye-catching variables than men in most cases, especially with regards to color and accessories.
So… does this tip involve procreation-like activities between consenting ‘not parental’ father figures?
Voat was batshit crazy, but some of the things done there were done well. I really liked that the ‘big subs’ were considered voat run, so the moderators didn’t get to make their own little kingdoms of folly in the most popular areas. The commitment to free speech was great. It just went down so hard because the first people who went to it were the type to scrawl on the walls of their house in pastel crayon and neon spray paint.
Sheesh, I’ll leave this here for both of you.
Okay, I’m taking that. It’s mine now. It’s beautiful.
It takes a while to get through the blagh that the midseason brings, each and every season.
Now that you say that, it’s really an odd, surreal experience. Were my fellow children unique, and just did not grow up, and made a blend of their childhood and what should be adult pursuits, or were people in the past just as fucked up, but all they had to make porn of was Charles Dickens and Dante and such?
Well, sure, but that’s why you read GoT and don’t watch it. Also, bad endings and all that.
You’re right. It’s not just legal reasons. There are some neat studies showing that if two people under the age of 5 are raised in the same household together, feelings of sexual attraction generally don’t develop later when you’re sexually maturing. So the porn somewhat follows reality in the scenario of step-siblings being more likely to develop sexual attraction.