They’re bots that hooked onto the wrong video

It’s Boeing, they do that anyway.

I conflated the two. You’re right. But there were unedited satellite broadcasts with weird shit. I’ll see if I can dig up something.

Here’s the sort of thing from back in the day https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFczpXAGz8Q&t=34

You should have seen how bad that kind of stuff was when satellite TV was new. Channels would broadcast straight out into the airwaves and not bother to cut the feed. There’s some old fox news clips for example of the guy losing his shit when he kept flubbing his lines. Can’t remember his name.

Consider the UK’s BBC and the guardian. They do it well and the perspective is just a little outside the American bubble. Used them and their live threads the past two elections.

Communists took it?

They don’t see either as people

Drunk scientist man-pickle

“Economics” aren’t political?

It was a joke. He famously does his own stunts.

Like Tom Cruise and his stunt double?

The 80s: clear your throat in too high of a pitch? Get followed to the bathroom and the shit kicked out of you.

This one was good.

https://open.spotify.com/episode/1xj51Tr4n4lPRvDoxeg8aV

I’m pretty sure it’s the follow-up though

Some downtown big cities had the buildings interconnected.

Another odd Canadian one. It has been codified that a suspect saying the words “I’m sorry” cannot be used as proof of guilt. Since in Canada especially, it leans a bit more into meaning “pardon” or “excuse me” rather than how an American might interpret it more as an apology.

The name of the accused can’t usually be reported on in Canada. Though there seems to be many exceptions. Also, released offenders get a lot of protection. It’s pretty controversial, especially when it’s someone famous like this case.

Yikes

Oh shit, I thought he was running for president or something

It’s fine. We know you’ll call the BBC a leftist rag.