snipgan

double stuffed oreo cat

If there is, it won’t be shared currently due to it being an ongoing investigation.

But something must be there if the Canadian government is making this statement instead of ignoring it. Sounds like the media was going to push the story anyway, but they got ahead of it.

The USA already said they aren’t distancing themselves from it and working with Canada with this.

We will see how things turn out, but things are pointing to more than likely India did something. Especially with the swarm of comments/bots pulling the whole “well he deserved it” and “hypocrites” all over.

Regardless if the guy deserved it or not, killing them in a country you are supposed to be on good terms with is not the way to go about it.

At this point India is barely even trying to hide it.

Unfortunately, as long as the lights stay on, air conditioning keeps blasting, grocery store stays stocked, and entertainment remains flowing then people won’t do anything.

The people who could do something would make them lose the next election, be labeled terrorists, or start get harping on “won’t you think of the economy!”

Progress is being made, but drastic measures needed to happen decades ago. The question is now how quickly and badly will things get, and how well we can manage it…

Same.

I definitely think some sort of residuals or compensation for reusing their voice AI should happen if they are profiting off of it.

That being said, I see a world in the very near future where voice actors don’t even act out their lines and just say a number of things for recording to train an AI voiced version of themselves. Then directors/creators and just manipulate and use it as they please to create their product.

Some mods in games are getting this already, voiced Morrowind and the like, and I definitely seeing it as a boon. Voice acting has always been a weak point when it came to stuff like that as you can write/script/design the best you can but can lack decent/any voice acting.

Interested to see how things play out.

I just want a hug!

Correct.

2 years and younger is recommended to not wear a mask for those reasons.

The parent might not realize it and trying to protect there baby, but this is a classic case of good intentions leading to unintended outcomes.

God Dammit

But that can be a big problem because humans cool themselves by sweating: the ambient heat evaporates sweat from our skin, and that keeps us from getting too hot. If the relative humidity is already near 100 percent, the air simply can’t take any more. Our sweat doesn’t get evaporated as easily, and we can’t cool down. This makes humid heat not just uncomfortable, but dangerous.

This is why I stay in northern Michigan.

Still not wrong

You just keep making claims. With no proof or evidence.

You just made another one about using “bad actors” to give up on freedom, then have the gall to say you aren’t jumping around.

Haven’t proven anything. Haven’t shown your way to be right. Haven’t shown any consistency.

Your rambling at this point.

STOP WASTING TIME

Edit: so much for getting me a bunch of sources after 10 hours to “get to my computer”

You don’t care about anything beyond pushing your own narrative.

You keep jumping around to different claims, with no sources backing them up for what you said.

You claim to be protecting freedom of speech, but you aren’t. You are only protecting bad faith actors, bots, and liars.

The line has to be drawn somewhere, and when it come to the health and safety of the public somethings have to take priority. Necessary things from what I have seen.

And this case is being appealed.

Biden admin’s likely appeal
Assuming the Biden administration appeals Doughty’s ruling on the preliminary injunction, the government would likely make arguments similar to what it wrote in a May 2023 filing. There is a high legal bar for ruling that “significant encouragement” would “convert private conduct into state action,” the administration argued.

“Since 2017, Executive Branch agencies and officials have promoted authoritative information or expressed concerns with the spread of misinformation,” but “consistently recognized social media companies’ authority over their platforms,” Department of Justice lawyers wrote.

I copied what you said. You claimed otherwise and said something different before, even if you repasted your comment.

Now you are on to ANOTHER claim about the FBI censoring after specifying “they”.

Still no proof or good sources from you.

WASTING TIME

Spritz some butter/oil on the edges and crust?

This is bullshit. They were calling certain things misinformation before they themselves knew. What gives them authority to do this and who actually decides what is true? At the time many scientists, including the CDC director (who was forced to resign), were saying we should investigate the lab leak theory, and they were all silenced as a result. Scientists were saying that they wouldn’t have suggested quarantine (including the UKs top health advisor) as the understaffed medical/health facilities would cause more death than quarantines would save, they were saying that masks had little to no impact on CORONA viruses in the past and peer-reviewed articles suggesting this were literally removed from websites; the list goes on. Meanwhile the MSM was literally spreading misinformation like the Ivermectin story or the vaccine stopping spread story. You really have to trust someone quite a bit to just go along with this while all your freedoms are diminishing.

I said that our government (US if that wasn’t clear) wasn’t suggesting solutions to the pandemic solely based on science in many cases.

No you didn’t. Liar

And you haven’t proven or shown that “They were calling certain things misinformation before they themselves knew.”

Whoever “they” are.

Many people assume the rule traces to “some old studies” on the flu, which found droplets won’t travel further than six feet, Gottlieb said—though research has since shown that Covid-19 can be spread through aerosols, which have the potential to travel many times further than droplets.

You didn’t claim otherwise to social distancing. And this has to do with further research giving us better understanding.

Especially with people knew with confidence at the time. With everything being hectic.

You are still wasting my and everyone’s TIME.

Then you are admitting you are wrong and aren’t acting in good faith. The literal next section of that article mentions it.

Just repeating yourself won’t make you right. And above all else, you haven’t proven anything today.

If you keep wasting everyone’s time prepare for more of it.

No you didn’t. It talks about it.

Making another claim about bias won’t help you. And still leaves the rest of what I said.