• EmiliaTheHero
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Your first two examples open up more opportunities for outplays. The opposing team can recognize that you have picked up on their patterns and then run fake-out plays to catch you off guard. Sign stealing just allows you to know exactly what the other team is about to do and there is no opportunity for them to fake you out. (Other than switching to a new set of signs, but learning signs is boring for the players and not entertaining for the audience).

    To equate it to poker: Your first two examples are similar to learning one of your opponents tells. If you start to exploit their tell, they can start faking it to force you to fold or place a bad bet. Sign stealing is like taking a peak at their cards

    • g0d0fm15ch13f@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Actually a fantastic analogy. And like I said, I don’t much care for sign stealing, I think there are better ways to more reliably put yourself in a position to win. I just think it’s funny that we expect and even encourage the runner on second to watch the signs but as soon as it’s somebody with a camera it’s against the rules.

    • QHC@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t see any material difference, signs can be changed easier than formations.

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Stealing signs themselves isn’t against rules, and is overblown. There was a pre-covid pro game where Tony Romo called basically every play as an announcer.