• Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    11 months ago

    It’s not a scam. Satellite internet was extremely expensive and slow last time I checked a few years before starlink. Yeah , musk is garbage but starlink is actually helping a lot of people worldwide.

      • Otter@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        The money would have come from the Rural Digital Opportunity Fund program (RDOF), but the FCC writes that Starlink wasn’t able to “demonstrate that it could deliver the promised service” and that giving the subsidy to it wouldn’t be “the best use of limited Universal Service Fund dollars.”

        The FCC decision sounds like a good thing in this case, also because Starlink isn’t being managed responsibly

        The technology itself is cool, and I hope some other companies can build off that work to meet that need. There are a lot of existing companies that take advantage of those living in rural areas, many of which don’t have other options or much disposable income

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Starlink is currently the only internet functioning for the Ukrainian army.

      • SupraMario@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        11 months ago

        ITAR…go look it up. And the UA still uses it for good and so does everyone there, they just cannot use it as a direct weapon. Get off the musk hate dick… it’s clouding you and apparently a bunch of people’s judgement.

        • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          Like most people on the Internet they don’t want to hear about laws that cause outcomes different than what they want. The Musk hate over UA and StarLink is just another example of it. ITAR has been around a long time and for DAMN good reasons.

          • SupraMario@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I can’t stand the guy either, but there are way more valid reasons to hate on him than what people love to bitch about.

    • Scrof@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      It’s probably the most wasteful way of providing internet imaginable since they have to send satellites up by the dozen every year for them to burn in the atmosphere only several years lates. Yeah I don’t think it’s a good business model at all, especially considering they haven’t been able to turn a profit and rely on subsidies.

      • TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yet many towns where I live saw broadband, yes, broadband, not fiber, for the first time in their life thanks to Starlink. It’s easy to talk when coming from a place of privilege.

        • Bo7a@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I would not be able to live where I am without starlink. There isn’t even cell signal for 14 km…

          I don’t like that some portion of the money I’m paying goes towards his insanity. But I put up with it to live in a peaceful forest and continue my job.

        • drkt@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          11 months ago

          Demand more of your local government instead of pulling the privilege card.

          • netburnr@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            The government keeps giving money to traditionally ISPs to expand broadband and they simply lie and say they did to take the money. It’s private industry fucking us just as much.

            • drkt@feddit.dk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              I’m not disagreeing, but who can stand up against corporate bullying? The government. Make the government do it. The corporate world gets away with it because the politicians turn a blind eye because they’re not held accountable because not enough people stand together. People have bled for the rights that “privileged” people have, it didn’t come free.

        • Oderus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s it really a privilege to live in a city? Sounds more like a choice than privilege. Your choice has consequences and the further you live from the other people, the more problems you’ll have with certain infrastructure like water, power, internet.

          • Bo7a@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            But I can build my own power and water infra. And I have. I can’t build my own connection to the internet, which I need to have in order to make money to do the rest of what it takes to live.

              • Bo7a@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                That starlink solves the remaining piece of missing infra that a normal person needs, regardless of the choice to live in a city or not. Even if the CEO is a blight on our species.

                • Oderus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Starlink only has a business as long as other ISP’s do nothing for rural homes.

                  Once they do, and they will, Starlink is dead.

                  • Bo7a@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    11 months ago

                    I would cherish that day!

                    It will probably happen if this capitalist wet-dream mellows a bit and government is incentivized to provide their own internet infra regardless of profit. But I am 45 and will probably be long decomposed by then.

                    But in the near-term - I can’t see any land-based ISP covering where I live.

                    The cost to run 15km of lines to town, when even power poles don’t exist, just to service me and the one other nutter who decided to live up here would be prohibitive even for govt funded public internet.

      • Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        If ISPs weren’t greedy bastards that don’t care the slightest about their users and gave everyone fiber then yeah, it’s wasteful. Sadly, for a lot of people in rural and inaccessible areas and on sea, it’s the only way to access internet.

    • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Oh no! It’s expensive! Wait. Isn’t he the chairman of a vertically integrated space shuttle and satellite international conglomerate? Why are Americans footing the bill for any of this?

      • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        You might go back and reread the comment you replied to. They stated that legacy satellite internet was expensive to the tune of $200/mo for 2mbps speeds and a 20GB monthly data cap.

      • TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I think it’s the other way around…you WANT everything he touches to be a scam.

        I don’t like the guy either, but Starlink is a real, actual product that tons of people are using just fine right now. Also, his rockets are allowing the US to continue to send personnel to the space station without relying on Russia. That is not a scam either.

        • theodewere@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          11 months ago

          by trying to go with “i know you are but what am i”, you just prove how childish your belief in him is

          • TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Actually, failing to address any of my points and just hammering on the “Musk bad” seems childish to me.

            • theodewere@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              you have no points… i’ve seen their numbers… the subscriber growth is non-existent… revenue is abysmal… the costs are exactly exorbitant… there is nothing to hide… it is a failure hoping for a rescue… think what you like…

              • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                11 months ago

                the subscriber growth is non-existent

                WTF are you on about?

                In January of 2022 SL had about 245,000 subscribers. In January of 2023 they had 1,000,000 subscribers. In September of 2023 SL had over 2,000,000 subscribers. They’ve increased by a factor of 10 in less than 24 months and doubled in the last 9!

                Musk is an ass but what your saying about SL just isn’t true.

              • TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                That’s what Starship is for. A giant, cheap, stainless steel space truck built by blue collar welders that will vomit out hundreds of them before returning to Earth intact to pick up some more.

                The whole Mars thing is just for PR. He has a different use for it. That thing ain’t ever making it to Mars.

                  • TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    Cryo boiloff for long duration missions hasn’t been solved, for one. Have you seen how much it vents just sitting on the pad?

                  • Balex@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    You have yet to actually provide any counter points other than plugging your ears and saying “Nu uh!”

      • Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        Why would I want it to not be a scam ? I don’t even use it. Years ago, I heard about internet satellite and got curious, so I searched a bit about it and found out it was really expensive. I don’t remember exactly but it was more or less in the 100s of dollars monthly for an abysmal speed like " up to 8mb" or something.

        If anyone used internet satellite a few years before starlink was launched please correct me if I am wrong.

        • Zoboomafoo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          You’re not far off, my parents have a 5gb data cap, about 1-2mbps down, and pings in the 500s.

          I don’t know how much they’re charged, but Starlink is cheaper and better in all aspects

          • rigamarole@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I had a neighbor ask me about my Starlink. They said they had ViaSat and were posting $180 a month for a 2gb data cap with 2-3mb speeds and would have to purchase more for overages. Internet was a requirement because she worked from home. I used to have Hughesnet and they have the same structure.

            Yes, Musk sucks, but Starlink has been a game changer for us rural folk.

          • Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            So it’s far worse than I remember. Honestly, I can see the 1-2 mb limit be enough for very casual use but a 5gb data cap for a month is beyond a joke.